Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 557.3 (2026)
Conveyance passes grantor’s interest
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Every conveyance of real estate passes all the interest of the grantor therein, unless a contrary intent can be reasonably inferred from the terms used. [C51, §1201; R60, §2209; C73, §1930; C97, §2914; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §10042; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §557.3]
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1949–2021 · leading case: Nichols v. City of Evansdale, 687 N.W.2d 562 (Iowa 2004).
Nichols v. City of Evansdale, 687 N.W.2d 562 (Iowa 2004). “” Iowa Code 557.3 *567 (2003) (emphasis added).”
Lowers v. United States, 663 N.W.2d 408 (Iowa 2003). “See Iowa Code § 557.3 (conveyance passes all of the grantor’s interests unless a contrary intent may be inferred from language used).”
Rausch v. Devine, 80 P.3d 733 (Alaska 2003). “Iowa Code Ann. § 557.3 (West, WESTLAW through 2002 2d.”
McKinley v. Waterloo R.R., 368 N.W.2d 131 (Iowa 1985). “Iowa Code §§ 2914 , 2958 (1897); Iowa Code §§ 557.3 , 558.19 (1975). The deed then states that should the “land” hereby “conveyed” cease to be used for railway purposes, it shall “revert” to the farm from which it was taken.”
Hawk v. Rice, 325 N.W.2d 97 (Iowa 1982). “Iowa Code § 557.3 (1981). The grantor’s intent is controlling, and it is ascertained by applying general contract principles.”
Henkel v. Auchstetter, 39 N.W.2d 650 (Iowa 1949). “Section 557.3, Code, 1946 (Code of 1851, section 1201) provides that, “Every conveyance of real estate passes all the interest of the grantor therein, unless a contrary intent can be reasonably inferred from the terms used.”
Crecelius v. Smith, 125 N.W.2d 786 (Iowa 1964). “Most important is section 557.3, Code of 1962, which has been a part of our law since 1851.”
Reusch v. Shafer, 41 N.W.2d 651 (Iowa 1950). “Under section 557.3, Code of 1946, it passed all interest of the grantor therein to the grantees.”
Phipps v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 674 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “And I warrant the title thereto against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.”
Ross v. Ross, 126 N.W.2d 369 (Iowa 1964). “By way of separate defense it was asserted that such oral agreement, even if made, would not be enforceable by reason of the provisions of sections 557.3 and 557.10, quoted infra, and subsection 3 of section 622.”
McNertney v. Kahler, 710 N.W.2d 209 (Iowa 2006). “Therefore, once title passed to Harold, Ménke could no longer transfer any interest in the property to Kahler because he had no such interest to convey.”
Burgess v. United States, 109 Fed. Cl. 223 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “This omission of such caveats is significant for under Iowa law, “[ejvery conveyance of real estate passes all the interest of the grantor therein, unless a contrary intent can be reasonably inferred from the terms used.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.