1. In a proceeding to establish paternity in law or in equity the court may on its own
motion, and upon request of a party shall, require the child, mother, and alleged father to
submit to blood or genetic tests, except that if the mother and child previously submitted
blood or genetic specimens in a prior action to establish paternity against a different alleged
father, the previously submitted specimens and prior results, if available, may be utilized for
testing in this action.
2. If a blood or genetic test is required, the court shall direct that inherited characteristics
be determined by appropriate testing procedures, and shall appoint an expert qualified as an
examiner of genetic markers to analyze and interpret the results and to report to the court.
Appropriate testing procedures shall include any genetic test generally acknowledged as
reliable by accreditation bodies designated by the secretary of the United States department
of health and human services and which are performed by a laboratory approved by such an
accreditation body.
3. Verified documentation of the chain of custody of the blood or genetic specimen is
competent evidence to establish the chain of custody. The testimony of the court-appointed
expert at trial is not required.
4. A verified expert’s report shall be admitted at trial. A copy of a bill for blood or genetic
testing shall be admitted as evidence, without requiring third-party foundation testimony, and
shall constitute prima facie evidence of amounts incurred for blood or genetic testing.
5. The results of the tests shall have the following effects:
a. Test results which show a statistical probability of paternity are admissible. To
challenge the test results, a party shall file a notice of the challenge, with the court, no later
than twenty days after the filing of the expert’s report with the clerk of the district court.
(1) Any subsequent rescheduling or continuances of the originally scheduled hearing
shall not extend the original time frame.
(2) Any challenge filed after the time frame is not acceptable or admissible by the court.
(3) If a challenge is not timely filed, the test results shall be admitted as evidence of
paternity without the need of additional proof of authenticity or accuracy.
b. If the expert concludes that the test results show that the alleged father is not excluded
and that the probability of the alleged father’s paternity is ninety-five percent or higher, there
shall be a rebuttable presumption that the alleged father is the father, and this evidence must
be admitted.
(1) To challenge this presumption of paternity, a party must file a notice of the challenge
with the court within the time frames prescribed in paragraph “a”.
(2) The party challenging the presumption of the alleged father’s paternity has the burden
of proving that the alleged father is not the father of the child.
\n
Tue Dec 09 21:59:50 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 600B (33, 0)
§600B.41, PATERNITY AND OBLIGATION FOR SUPPORT 10\n\n (3) The presumption of paternity can be rebutted only by clear and convincing evidence.
c. If the expert concludes that the test results show that the alleged father is not excluded
and that the probability of the alleged father’s paternity is less than ninety-five percent,
test results shall be weighed along with other evidence of the alleged father’s paternity. To
challenge the test results, a party must file a notice of the challenge with the court within
the time frames prescribed in paragraph “a”.
6. If the results of the tests or the expert’s analysis of inherited characteristics is disputed
in a timely fashion, the court, upon reasonable request of a party, shall order that an
additional test be made by the same laboratory or an independent laboratory at the expense
of the party requesting additional testing. When a subsequent test is conducted, all time
frames prescribed in this chapter associated with blood or genetic tests shall apply to the
most recently completed test.
7. All costs shall be paid by the parties or parents in proportions and at times determined
by the court, except as otherwise provided pursuant to section 600B.41A.
[C81, §675.41]
92 Acts, ch 1195, §210
C93, §600B.41
93 Acts, ch 79, §22, 23; 94 Acts, ch 1171, §45 – 47, 52; 95 Acts, ch 52, §9; 97 Acts, ch 175,
§210, 211; 2015 Acts, ch 110, §125
Referred to in §232.3A, 252A.6A, 600A.7, 600B.9, 600B.41A
\n
Notes of Decisions
Joseph O. Dier v. Cassandra Jo Peters (2012)
iowa · cites it 12×
“See Iowa Code § 600B.41(1). If the putative father does not exercise that right and a support decree is entered, then it is fair to give that decree a measure of finality.”
State Ex Rel. Baumgartner v. Wilcox (1995)
iowa · cites it 43×
“1 However, the court treated Wilcox’s application as an application to overcome paternity under Iowa Code section 600B.41(7) (1993). 2 Pursuant to that section, the court ordered blood or genetic testing of Wilcox, the mother, and the child, suspended execution on the default…”
Callender v. Skiles (1999)
iowa · cites it 4×
“§ 600B.41. Thus, Charles does not become the established father by virtue of the blood tests that have been taken in this case.”
Petition of Bruce (1994)
iowa · cites it 8×
“He claims that the blood tests were ordered pursuant to what is now Iowa Code section 600B.41 (1993) (formerly section 675.”
In the Interest of M.M.S. (1993)
iowa · cites it 2×
“41 (since transferred and rewritten in Iowa Code § 600B.41 (1993)). Brent missed the first scheduled appointment but did appear by arrangement several days later.”
In re Fiscus (2012)
iowactapp · cites it 2×
“41A, but if unsuccessful, to then utilize section 600B.41 A(6)(b) to modify “custody, visitation and child support” provisions of the prior dissolution decree entered under Chapter 598.”
Dye v. Geiger (1996)
iowa · cites it 2×
“The decision rests in the sound judgment of the trial court, as evidenced by the highly discretionary language chosen by the legislature: If the court determines that test results conducted in accordance with section 600B.41 or chapter 252F exclude the established father as the…”
Callender v. Skiles (2001)
iowa · cites it 2×
“Iowa Code § 600B.41 A(6)(a)(2) (emphasis added).”
Crouse v. Crouse (1996)
sd
“Iowa Code Ann § 600B.41 (West 1993)(be-fore 1994 amendment)(emphasis added).”
State Ex Rel. Westendorf v. Westendorf (2000)
iowa · cites it 2×
“The question is how to apply section 600B.41(4)(b) in this situation. Finding no error in the district court’s calculation and judgment, we affirm.”
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(1) — 2 cases
Joseph O. Dier v. Cassandra Jo Peters (2012)
iowa
“See Iowa Code § 600B.41(1). If the putative father does not exercise that right and a support decree is entered, then it is fair to give that decree a measure of finality.”
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(2)(e) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(4) — 1 case
Joseph O. Dier v. Cassandra Jo Peters (2012)
iowa
“See Iowa Code § 600B.41(1). If the putative father does not exercise that right and a support decree is entered, then it is fair to give that decree a measure of finality.”
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(4)(b) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Westendorf v. Westendorf (2000)
iowa
“The question is how to apply section 600B.41(4)(b) in this situation. Finding no error in the district court’s calculation and judgment, we affirm.”
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(5) — 2 cases
Callender v. Skiles (1999)
iowa
“§ 600B.41. Thus, Charles does not become the established father by virtue of the blood tests that have been taken in this case.”
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(6)(a)(1) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(6)(a)(2) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(7) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Baumgartner v. Wilcox (1995)
iowa
“1 However, the court treated Wilcox’s application as an application to overcome paternity under Iowa Code section 600B.41(7) (1993). 2 Pursuant to that section, the court ordered blood or genetic testing of Wilcox, the mother, and the child, suspended execution on the default…”
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(7)(a) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Baumgartner v. Wilcox (1995)
iowa
“1 However, the court treated Wilcox’s application as an application to overcome paternity under Iowa Code section 600B.41(7) (1993). 2 Pursuant to that section, the court ordered blood or genetic testing of Wilcox, the mother, and the child, suspended execution on the default…”
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(7)(a)(4) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Baumgartner v. Wilcox (1995)
iowa
“1 However, the court treated Wilcox’s application as an application to overcome paternity under Iowa Code section 600B.41(7) (1993). 2 Pursuant to that section, the court ordered blood or genetic testing of Wilcox, the mother, and the child, suspended execution on the default…”
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(7)(c) — 2 cases
Joseph O. Dier v. Cassandra Jo Peters (2012)
iowa
“See Iowa Code § 600B.41(1). If the putative father does not exercise that right and a support decree is entered, then it is fair to give that decree a measure of finality.”
State Ex Rel. Baumgartner v. Wilcox (1995)
iowa
“1 However, the court treated Wilcox’s application as an application to overcome paternity under Iowa Code section 600B.41(7) (1993). 2 Pursuant to that section, the court ordered blood or genetic testing of Wilcox, the mother, and the child, suspended execution on the default…”
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(7)(d) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Baumgartner v. Wilcox (1995)
iowa
“1 However, the court treated Wilcox’s application as an application to overcome paternity under Iowa Code section 600B.41(7) (1993). 2 Pursuant to that section, the court ordered blood or genetic testing of Wilcox, the mother, and the child, suspended execution on the default…”
— Iowa Code § 600B.41(7)(e) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Baumgartner v. Wilcox (1995)
iowa
“1 However, the court treated Wilcox’s application as an application to overcome paternity under Iowa Code section 600B.41(7) (1993). 2 Pursuant to that section, the court ordered blood or genetic testing of Wilcox, the mother, and the child, suspended execution on the default…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.