Iowa Code » Chapter 602 — JUDICIAL BRANCH
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 602.2103 (2026)

Operation of commission

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A quorum of the commission is four members. Only those commission members that are present at commission meetings or hearings may vote. An application by the commission to the supreme court to retire, discipline, or remove a judicial officer, or discipline or remove an employee of the judicial branch, or an action by the commission which affects the final disposition of a complaint, requires the affirmative vote of at least four commission members. Notwithstanding chapter 21 and chapter 22, all records, papers, proceedings, meetings, and hearings of the commission are confidential, but if the commission applies to the supreme court to retire, discipline, or remove a judicial officer, or to discipline or remove an employee

\n

Tue Dec 09 22:00:11 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 602 (74, 2) 21 JUDICIAL BRANCH, §602.2106\n\nof the judicial branch, the application and all of the records and papers in that proceeding are public documents. 83 Acts, ch 186, §3103, 10201; 92 Acts, ch 1228, §32; 98 Acts, ch 1047, §54

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2012 · leading case: In Re Inquiry Concerning Stigler, 607 N.W.2d 699 (Iowa 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Inquiry Concerning Stigler, 607 N.W.2d 699 (Iowa 2000). · cites it 8× “*706 See Iowa Code § 602.2103 . We conclude that the right to a public hearing conferred by the Sixth Amendment to the Federal Constitution is by its own terms applicable only in criminal proceedings.”
In the Matter of Honorable Daniel Lee BLOCK, Associate Juv. Judge of the First Jud. Dist., 816 N.W.2d 362 (Iowa 2012). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 602.2103 . 2 . We act on an application from the Commission on Judicial Qualifications in the same manner as appeals in cases subject to expedited time requirements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.