1. After July 1, 1992, an action shall not be maintained in a court, either at law or in
equity, in order to recover or establish an interest in or claim to real estate if all the following
conditions are satisfied:
a. The action is based upon a claim arising more than ten years earlier or existing for
more than ten years.
b. The action is against the holder of the record title to the real estate in possession.
c. The holder of the record title to the real estate in possession and the holder’s immediate
or remote grantors are shown by the record to have held chain of title to the real estate for
more than ten years.
2. a. The claimant within ten years of the date on which the claim arose or first existed
must file with the county recorder in the county where the real estate is located a written
statement which is duly acknowledged and definitely describes the real estate involved, the
nature and extent of the right of interest claimed, and the facts upon which the claim is based.
The claimant must file the statement in person or by the claimant’s attorney or agent. If the
claimant is a minor or under a legal disability, the statement must be filed by the claimant’s
guardian, trustee, or by either parent.
b. The filing of a claim shall extend for a further period of ten years the time within which
such action may be brought by any person entitled to bring the claim. The person may file
extensions for successive claims.
3. Nothing in this section shall be construed to revive any cause of action barred by section
614.17.
91 Acts, ch 183, §37; 2013 Acts, ch 30, §261
Referred to in §614.17, 614.18, 614.19, 614.20
\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
12
cases (
5 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case:
Garrett v. Huster, 684 N.W.2d 250 (Iowa 2004).
Garrett v. Huster, 684 N.W.2d 250 (Iowa 2004).
· cites it 17× “He argues the trial court erred in failing to uphold his title to the property on the basis of (1) adverse possession, (2) the bar of Iowa Code section 614.17A (2001), (3) the doctrine of laches, or (4) the doctrine of equitable estoppel.”
In re Est. of Franken (Iowa 2020).
· cites it 41× “The executor disallowed the claim and moved for summary judgment on the ground the claim was barred by the limitations period set forth in Iowa Code section 614.17A (2016). The district court granted the estate’s motion.”
In re Est. of Franken (Iowa Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 27× “The estate moved for summary judgment, relying in part on Iowa Code section 614.17A (2017). That provision states, “[A]n action shall not be maintained in a court, either at law or in equity, in order to recover or establish an interest in or claim to real estate if .”
David A. Vaudt & Jeanie K. Vaudt v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Iowa 2024).
· cites it 6× “Section 614.17A governs such actions filed after July 1, 1992, and precludes “claim[s] arising more than ten years earlier or existing for more than ten years” against a title holder in possession if the title holder has “held chain of title for more than ten years,” id.”
State of Iowa v. Larry Gross (Iowa 2019).
· cites it 2× “Additionally, section 614.17A(2) limits the lien created by a civil judgment to ten years.”
— Iowa Code § 614.17A(1) — 6 cases
Garrett v. Huster, 684 N.W.2d 250 (Iowa 2004).
“He argues the trial court erred in failing to uphold his title to the property on the basis of (1) adverse possession, (2) the bar of Iowa Code section 614.17A (2001), (3) the doctrine of laches, or (4) the doctrine of equitable estoppel.”
In re Est. of Franken (Iowa 2020).
“The executor disallowed the claim and moved for summary judgment on the ground the claim was barred by the limitations period set forth in Iowa Code section 614.17A (2016). The district court granted the estate’s motion.”
— Iowa Code § 614.17A(1)(a) — 1 case
In re Est. of Franken (Iowa 2020).
“The executor disallowed the claim and moved for summary judgment on the ground the claim was barred by the limitations period set forth in Iowa Code section 614.17A (2016). The district court granted the estate’s motion.”
— Iowa Code § 614.17A(1)(b) — 2 cases
In re Est. of Franken (Iowa 2020).
“The executor disallowed the claim and moved for summary judgment on the ground the claim was barred by the limitations period set forth in Iowa Code section 614.17A (2016). The district court granted the estate’s motion.”
— Iowa Code § 614.17A(1)(c) — 2 cases
In re Est. of Franken (Iowa 2020).
“The executor disallowed the claim and moved for summary judgment on the ground the claim was barred by the limitations period set forth in Iowa Code section 614.17A (2016). The district court granted the estate’s motion.”
— Iowa Code § 614.17A(2) — 4 cases
In re Est. of Franken (Iowa 2020).
“The executor disallowed the claim and moved for summary judgment on the ground the claim was barred by the limitations period set forth in Iowa Code section 614.17A (2016). The district court granted the estate’s motion.”
David A. Vaudt & Jeanie K. Vaudt v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Iowa 2024).
“Section 614.17A governs such actions filed after July 1, 1992, and precludes “claim[s] arising more than ten years earlier or existing for more than ten years” against a title holder in possession if the title holder has “held chain of title for more than ten years,” id.”
— Iowa Code § 614.17A(l)(a) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 614.17A(l)(c) — 1 case
Garrett v. Huster, 684 N.W.2d 250 (Iowa 2004).
“He argues the trial court erred in failing to uphold his title to the property on the basis of (1) adverse possession, (2) the bar of Iowa Code section 614.17A (2001), (3) the doctrine of laches, or (4) the doctrine of equitable estoppel.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.