To the extent a power of attorney expressly grants an agent authority over the content of electronic communications sent or received by the principal and unless directed otherwise by the principal or the court, a custodian shall disclose to the agent the content if the agent gives the custodian all of the following:
1. A written request for disclosure in physical or electronic form.
2. An original or copy of the power of attorney expressly granting the agent authority over the content of electronic communications of the principal.
3. A certification by the agent, under penalty of perjury, that the power of attorney is in effect. The certification form provided in section 633B.302 shall satisfy the requirement of this subsection.
4. If requested by the custodian, any of the following:\n\nTue Dec 09 21:58:25 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 638 (21, 0) 5 FIDUCIARY ACCESS TO DIGITAL ASSETS, §638.13\n\n a. A number, username, address, or other unique subscriber or account identifier assigned by the custodian to identify the principal’s account.
b. Evidence linking the account to the principal. 2017 Acts, ch 79, §12 Referred to in §638.16 \n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases, 1948–1968 · leading case:
Ritter v. Dagel, 156 N.W.2d 318 (Iowa 1968).
Ritter v. Dagel, 156 N.W.2d 318 (Iowa 1968).
· cites it 4× “hereof, that merely filing plaintiff's petition to set aside probate of the will within a year after the date of the second publication of notice of probate of the will, without at least delivering original notice thereof to the sheriff of the proper county with intent that it…”
In Re Est. of Swanson, 31 N.W.2d 385 (Iowa 1948).
· cites it 2× “Catterson, both supra, we adopt a definition of “interlocutory” as “not finally decisive of a case.” By these tests this ex parte order is clearly interlocutory and subject to review in the- probate court.”
In Re Wissink's Est., 46 N.W.2d 717 (Iowa 1951).
· cites it 4× “Section 638.9, Iowa Code 1950,1. C. A., permits correction in the probate court of mistakes in settlements at any time before final settlement and discharge of the administrator “and after that time by equitable proceedings, on showing such grounds as will justify the…”
In Re Est. of Smith, 36 N.W.2d 815 (Iowa 1949).
· cites it 2× “At this time the claim had not been paid nor had filial settlement with the regular administrator been made.”
Oliver v. McDowell, 65 N.W.2d 92 (Iowa 1954).
· cites it 2× “Appellant assigns as error the vacating of the March 1952 order, contending that it was a final adjudication from which no appeal was taken. There is no merit to this claim.”
In Re Jenkins'Est., 65 N.W.2d 92 (Iowa 1954).
· cites it 2× “Appellant assigns as error the vacating of the March 1952 order, contending that it was a final adjudication from which no appeal was taken. There is no merit to this claim.”
Foley v. Engstrom, 74 N.W.2d 673 (Iowa 1956).
· cites it 4× “This action in equity was commenced under authority of section 638.9, Code of Iowa, 1954, which provides as follows: “Mistakes in settlements may be corrected in the probate court at any time before his final settlement and discharge, and after that time by equitable…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.