Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 651.31 (2026)

Factors court to consider in determining if partition in kind will result in great prejudice

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. The court shall consider all of the following factors in determining if partition in kind of heirs property will result in great prejudice to the cotenants of such property as a group:

a. Whether the heirs property can be practicably divided among the cotenants.

b. Whether a partition in kind will apportion the heirs property in such a way that the aggregate fair market value of the parcels resulting from the division will be materially less than the value of the heirs property if the heirs property is sold as a whole, taking into account the condition under which a court-ordered sale likely will occur.

c. Evidence of the collective duration of ownership or possession of the heirs property by a cotenant and one or more predecessors in title or predecessors in possession to the cotenant who are or were relatives of the cotenant or each other.

d. A cotenant’s sentimental attachment to the heirs property, including any attachment arising due to the heirs property having ancestral or other unique or special value to the cotenant.

e. The lawful use being made of the heirs property by a cotenant and the degree to which the cotenant will be harmed if the cotenant cannot continue the same use of the heirs property.

f. The degree to which a cotenant has contributed the cotenant’s pro rata share of the property taxes, insurance, and other expenses associated with maintaining ownership of the\n\nTue Dec 09 21:58:12 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 651 (65, 0) §651.31, PARTITION 10\n\nheirs property, or has contributed to the physical improvement, maintenance, or upkeep of the heirs property.

g. Tax consequences.

h. Any other factors the court deems relevant.

2. The court shall weigh the totality of all relevant factors and circumstances and not consider any one factor in subsection 1 to be dispositive. 2018 Acts, ch 1108, §31 Referred to in §651.30 \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: David A. Muhr & Christine L. Mickel v. Rachelle E. Willenborg (Iowa Ct. App. 2024).
David A. Muhr & Christine L. Mickel v. Rachelle E. Willenborg (Iowa Ct. App. 2024). “” See Iowa Code § 651.31 (1)(a), (d). Because the district court was in the better position to evaluate credibility, we defer to its acceptance of the referee’s report, which spelled out why partition wholly in kind was not practicable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.