Iowa Code » Chapter 7 — GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 7.22 (2026)

Exchange of offenders under treaty — consent by governor

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If a treaty in effect between the United States and a foreign country provides for the transfer or exchange of convicted offenders to the country of which the offenders are citizens or nationals, the governor or the governor’s designee, on behalf of the state and subject to the terms of the treaty, may authorize the transfer or exchange of offenders. 83 Acts, ch 203, §13

\n

Tue Dec 09 22:34:36 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 7 (21, 0)

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1963–2007 · leading case: City of Dubuque v. Iowa Trust, 519 N.W.2d 786 (Iowa 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Dubuque v. Iowa Trust, 519 N.W.2d 786 (Iowa 1994). “The firm next asserts an insufficient foundation for the court’s finding that the proposed class representatives will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
Town of Clive v. Colby, 121 N.W.2d 115 (Iowa 1963). · cites it 2× “), section 7.22, as follows: “A proceeding for the annexation of territory to a contiguous municipal corporation is ineffectual when instituted after the institution of a proceeding for the organization of the territory into a village or city, and while such proceeding is…”
Nw. Inv. Corp. v. Wallace, 741 N.W.2d 782 (Iowa 2007). “, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations § 7.22(c) (1994) (“[T]he court generally should give substantial weight to the highest realistic price that a willing, able, and fully informed buyer would pay for the corporation as an entity.”
Town of Clive v. Colby, 123 N.W.2d 331 (Iowa 1963). “) § 7.22 as follows: "A proceeding for the annexation of territory of a contiguous municipal corporation is ineffectual when instituted after the institution of a proceeding for the organization of the territory into a village or city, and while such proceeding is pending and…”
Ely, Inc. v. Wiley, 587 N.W.2d 465 (Iowa 1998). “Microfuel urges that we alter the standard of proof for judicial valuation of the shares of a dissenting shareholder to conform to the principles established in Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations § 7.22(b) (1994) promulgated by the American Law…”
Nw. Inv. Corp. Vs. Emmett Lee Wallace, William R. Harvey & Helen I. Harvey (Iowa 2007). “, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations § 7.22(c) (1994) (“[T]he court generally should give substantial weight to the highest realistic price that a willing, able, and fully informed buyer would pay for the corporation as an entity.”
— Iowa Code § 7.22(b) — 1 case
Ely, Inc. v. Wiley, 587 N.W.2d 465 (Iowa 1998). “Microfuel urges that we alter the standard of proof for judicial valuation of the shares of a dissenting shareholder to conform to the principles established in Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations § 7.22(b) (1994) promulgated by the American Law…”
— Iowa Code § 7.22(c) — 2 cases
Nw. Inv. Corp. v. Wallace, 741 N.W.2d 782 (Iowa 2007). “, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations § 7.22(c) (1994) (“[T]he court generally should give substantial weight to the highest realistic price that a willing, able, and fully informed buyer would pay for the corporation as an entity.”
Nw. Inv. Corp. Vs. Emmett Lee Wallace, William R. Harvey & Helen I. Harvey (Iowa 2007). “, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations § 7.22(c) (1994) (“[T]he court generally should give substantial weight to the highest realistic price that a willing, able, and fully informed buyer would pay for the corporation as an entity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.