Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 9.8 (2026)

Address confidentiality program revolving fund

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. An address confidentiality program revolving fund is created in the state treasury. The fund shall consist of moneys collected by the clerk of the district court for deposit in the fund pursuant to section 602.8108, subsection 6, and transfers of interest, earnings, and moneys from other funds as provided by law. The moneys in the fund are subject to appropriation to the office of the secretary of state by the general assembly. The office of the secretary of state shall administer the fund. The office of the secretary of state shall provide an annual report to the department of management and the legislative services agency on expenditures from the fund in a format as determined by the department of management in consultation with the legislative services agency. 2. To meet cash flow needs for the address confidentiality program established in chapter 9E, the office of secretary of state may temporarily use funds from the general fund of the state to pay expenses in excess of moneys available in the revolving fund for purposes of the program if those additional expenditures can be fully reimbursed with moneys collected pursuant to section 602.8108, subsection 6, and the office of the secretary of state reimburses the general fund of the state and ensures that all moneys are repaid in full by the close of the fiscal year. Because any general fund moneys used shall be fully reimbursed, such temporary use of funds from the general fund of the state shall not constitute an appropriation for purposes of calculating the state general fund expenditure limitation pursuant to section 8.54. \n Tue Dec 09 22:34:04 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 9 (33, 1) 3 SECRETARY OF STATE, §9.13\n\n 3. Section 8.33 does not apply to any moneys transferred, credited, or appropriated to the revolving fund. 2015 Acts, ch 96, §1; 2015 Acts, ch 141, §34, 35, 67, 68 Referred to in §602.8108\n\n 9.9 and 9.10 Reserved.\n\n SUBCHAPTER II EXTRA FILING SERVICES Referred to in §486A.105A, 488.206A, 489.122A, 490.120A, 491.5A, 499.44A, 501.105A, 501A.201A, 504.111A, 524.2002 \n

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: Wright v. Brooke Grp. Ltd., 652 N.W.2d 159 (Iowa 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wright v. Brooke Grp. Ltd., 652 N.W.2d 159 (Iowa 2002). “Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 9.8, at 521 (4th ed.1995) (stating authors’ belief that merchantability standard and tort standard for “defective condition” un *182 der section 402A “are interchangeable”).”

5th & Walnut Parking, LLC; 5th & Walnut Tower, LLC; 5th & Court, LLC; Justin Mandelbaum; & Sean Mandelbaum v. City of Des Moines (Iowa 2026). · cites it 20× “The City relies on Section 9.8 of the Development Agreement, which provides in relevant part: A.”

Eric N. Lucy v. Platinum Servs., Inc., now known as Platinum Supplemental Ins., Inc., & Wayne Briggs (Iowa Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “Section 9.8 conditioned Lucy’s right to installment payments, stating: “Lucy’s rights to payments pursuant to [section] 5.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.