Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 12-502 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

12-502.

History: L. 1929, ch. 109, § 2; Repealed, L. 1974, ch. 56, § 7; March 28.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1926–1980 · leading case: James v. City of Pittsburg, 407 P.2d 503 (Kan. 1965).
James v. City of Pittsburg, 407 P.2d 503 (Kan. 1965). · cites it 4× “Section 12-502 requires notice of time and place of hearing to be given and upon hearing, if the board is satisfied the addition of the territory will be to the city’s interest and will cause no manifest injury to property owners in the affected area, it shall so find and the…”
City of Lenexa v. City of Olathe, 620 P.2d 1153 (Kan. 1980). “In essence, the amendments changed the law to allow individual landowners standing to challenge annexation and also repealed K.S.A. 12-502(c)(1964) which related to quo warranto actions maintained by the state.”
Brown v. City of Junction City, 251 P. 726 (Kan. 1926). · cites it 2× “ever any city desires to enlarge the limits thereof from territory adjacent thereto, the governing body of such city shall in the name of the city present a petition to the district court of the county in which said city is situated, or the judge thereof, setting forth by metes…”
City of Salina v. Thompson, Tr. of Mo. Pac. Rly., 220 P.2d 147 (Kan. 1950). · cites it 2× “A hearing was held as provided in section 12-502, and on April 12, 1949, the board found: "1.”
City of Ottawa v. Goff, 279 P.2d 293 (Kan. 1955). · cites it 4× “Section 12-501 provides, in substance, that when any city desires to enlarge its limits, the city shall present a petition to the board of county commissioners setting forth in metes and bounds the territory sought to be added, asking the board of county commissioners to make a…”
— K.S.A. § 12-502(c)(1964) — 1 case
City of Lenexa v. City of Olathe, 620 P.2d 1153 (Kan. 1980). “In essence, the amendments changed the law to allow individual landowners standing to challenge annexation and also repealed K.S.A. 12-502(c)(1964) which related to quo warranto actions maintained by the state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.