K.S.A. » Chapter 13
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 13-1602 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

13-1602.

History: L. 1927, ch. 118, § 1; L. 1931, ch. 120, § 1; L. 1933, ch. 128, § 1; Repealed, L. 1968, ch. 249, § 1; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1927–1974 · leading case: State ex rel. Griffith v. City of Kansas City, 252 P. 714 (Kan. 1927).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Griffith v. City of Kansas City, 252 P. 714 (Kan. 1927). · cites it 31× “23,017, acted on authority alleged to have been conferred by section 13-1602 of the Revised Statutes of Kansas, 1923.”
State Ex Rel. Jordan v. City of Overland Park, 527 P.2d 1340 (Kan. 1974). · cites it 2× “lies “mainly within” the city of Kansas City, Kan., and, with reference to its character as being mainly within the city, it is believed that it is a “piece of land” lying “mainly within” the city in the sense of being mainly surrounded by the city, which seems to be the meaning…”
State Ex Rel. Hawks v. City of Topeka, 246 P.2d 250 (Kan. 1952). · cites it 2× “An examination of section 13-1602 reveals that the legislature definitely contemplated that at the time the mentioned notice should be given by the city clerk to the county clerk and county superintendent, there should be in existence and on file with the city a proposed…”
State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. City of Kansas City, 222 P.2d 714 (Kan. 1950). “35,841, were Sections 13-1602 and 13-1602a of the General Statutes of 1935, which statutes provide for the annexation of land by cities of the first class having a commission form of Government and the statutes referred to had not been repealed and were in full force and effect.”
State Ex Rel. Hawks v. City of Topeka, 243 P.2d 218 (Kan. 1952). · cites it 4× “, provided therein that the act should not repeal the provisions of 13-1602: “That sections 12-501 and 12-502 of the Revised Statutes of Kansas for 1923 be and the same are hereby repealed: Provided, This act shall not repeal section 13-202 and section 13-1602, Revised Statutes…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.