Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 16-1307 (2026)

Notice of termination; right to cure; approval of transfer of retailer's business

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

16-1307. Notice of termination; right to cure; approval of transfer of retailer's business. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a supplier shall provide a retailer at least 90 days' prior notice of termination, cancellation, or nonrenewal of the contract. The notice shall state all reasons constituting good cause for termination, cancellation or nonrenewal and shall provide that the dealer has 60 days in which to cure any claimed deficiency. If the deficiency is rectified within 60 days, the notice shall be void. The notice and right to cure provisions under this section shall not apply if the reason for termination, cancellation or nonrenewal is for any reason set forth in subsections (a) through (h) of K.S.A. 16-1306.

(b) In the event that a "supplier" of outdoor power equipment has contractual authority to approve or deny a request by a "retailer" to sell or transfer any portion of the retailer's business ownership to another party or to enter into an agreement to operate the dealership with another party, the supplier shall approve or deny the request within 90 days after receiving such a request. If the supplier has neither approved nor denied the request within 90 days, the request shall be deemed approved. The retailer's request shall include the reasonable financial information, personal background, character references and work histories as required by the supplier to render such a determination. In the event the supplier denies the request, the supplier shall provide the retailer with a written notice of its determination with the stated reasons for the denial.

History: L. 1991, ch. 67, § 7; L. 1998, ch. 79, § 2; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Defendant violated the Kansas Outdoor Power Equipment Dealership Act when defendant terminated a sale-and-service agreement with a retailer, because the evidence did not prove that the supplier terminated the agreement with good cause, proper notice or the statutory opportunity to cure. Roadbuilders Mach. Supply Co. v. Sandvik Mining & Constr. USA, LLC, 723 F. Supp. 3d 989, 1007 (D. Kan. 2024).


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2024 · leading case: In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Burrell, 367 P.3d 318 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Burrell, 367 P.3d 318 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). “2014), as “[a] legally sufficient reason,” is a phrase that is not uncommon in the Kansas Statutes.”
Roadbuilders Mach. Supply Co., Inc. v. Sandvik Mining & Constr. USA, LLC (D. Kan. 2024). · cites it 16× “Notice and Curative Opportunity Under K.S.A. § 16-1307 Defendant’s next argument is that it complied with § 16-1307.”
— K.S.A. § 16-1307(a) — 2 cases
In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Burrell, 367 P.3d 318 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). “2014), as “[a] legally sufficient reason,” is a phrase that is not uncommon in the Kansas Statutes.”
Roadbuilders Mach. Supply Co., Inc. v. Sandvik Mining & Constr. USA, LLC (D. Kan. 2024). “Notice and Curative Opportunity Under K.S.A. § 16-1307 Defendant’s next argument is that it complied with § 16-1307.”
— K.S.A. § 16-1307(h) — 1 case
Roadbuilders Mach. Supply Co., Inc. v. Sandvik Mining & Constr. USA, LLC (D. Kan. 2024). “Notice and Curative Opportunity Under K.S.A. § 16-1307 Defendant’s next argument is that it complied with § 16-1307.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.