History:
L. 1939, ch. 165, § 1; L. 1941, ch. 196, § 1; L. 1945, ch. 171, § 1; L. 1947, ch. 201, § 1; L. 1953, ch. 153, § 1; L. 1961, ch. 153, § 1; L. 1963, ch. 194, § 1; L. 1981, ch. 122, § 1; Repealed, L. 1991, ch. 56, § 28; January 1, 1992.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Constitutionality of act raised but not determined. Duggins v. Board of County Commissioners, 179 Kan. 101, 293 P.2d 258.
2. Zoning permit which allowed building of motel held not unreasonable. Hillebrand v. Board of County Commissioners, 180 Kan. 348, 350, 304 P.2d 517.
3. Legislative history of county zoning laws discussed. Spurgeon v. Board of Commissioners, 181 Kan. 1008, 1012, 317 P.2d 798.
4. Constitutionality not determinable because question not raised in trial court. Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 183 Kan. 19, 21, 325 P.2d 382.
5. State agency required to conform to land use zoning regulations; no automatic immunity. Brown v. Kansas Forestry, Fish and Game Commission, 2 Kan. App. 2d 102, 112, 576 P.2d 230.
6. Cited in construing K.S.A. 19-1921; exemption of agricultural purpose buildings from county zoning regulations held to include dwelling place. Blauvelt v. Board of Leavenworth County Comm'rs, 227 Kan. 110, 111, 114, 605 P.2d 132.
7. This and following sections cited in holding action commenced under K.S.A. 19-2913 governed by time limit for filing appeals under K.S.A. 60-511, not 19-223 or 60-2101(d). Bolser v. Zoning Board of Aubry Township, 4 Kan. App. 2d 288, 289, 605 P.2d 156.
8. Continuity of zoning promotes legislative policy that stable land use is beneficial to public. Colonial Investment Co. v. City of Leawood, 7 Kan. App. 2d 660, 665, 646 P.2d 1149 (1982).
9. Use of land for hunting preserve as agricultural use not requiring special permit determined. Corbet v. Board of Shawnee County Comm'rs, 14 Kan. App. 2d 123, 125, 783 P.2d 1310 (1990).
City of Salina v. Jaggers, 612 P.2d 618 (Kan. 1980). · cites it 4ד19-2905 must be read in conjunction with K.S.A. 19-2901 which sets forth the area under county control.”
State Ex Rel. Schneider v. City of Kansas City, 612 P.2d 578 (Kan. 1980). · cites it 2דUnder K.S.A. 19-2901, counties are given the power to zone `for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals, comfort, general welfare and conserving the values of property throughout that portion of any county zoned under the terms of this act.”
Crumbaker v. Hunt Midwest Mining, Inc., 69 P.3d 601 (Kan. 2003). “, for cities and joint committees of city and county planning boards, and at K.S.A. 19-2901 et seq., for counties and townships.”
Brown v. Kansas Forestry, Fish & Game Comm'n, 576 P.2d 230 (Kan. Ct. App. 1978). “Under K.S.A. 19-2901, counties are given the power to zone “for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals, comfort, general welfare and conserving the values of property throughout that portion of any county zoned under the terms of this act .”
Spurgeon v. Bd. of Commissioners, 317 P.2d 798 (Kan. 1957). “Sections 19-2901 to 19-2913 incl., provide a plan for zoning within any township in a county which lies outside the limits of any incorporated city.”
Miami Cnty. v. Svoboda, 955 P.2d 122 (Kan. 1998). “We recognized the legitimate concern with the problems of suburban development and that such development is subject to reasonable regulations within the provisions of K.S.A. 19-2901 et seq. However, based upon the specific facts, we reached a common *209 sense determination that…”
Creten v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 466 P.2d 263 (Kan. 1970). “The Wyandotte County zoning regulations adopted by the board of county commissioners have a provision that requires a "special permit" for the operation of an auto truck park, junk yard or a "mobile home park." While this case involves only the issuance of the "special permit"…”
Colonial Inv. Co. v. City of Leawood, 646 P.2d 1149 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). “, for cities and joint committees of city and county planning boards, and at K.S.A. 19-2901, et seq., for counties and townships.”
Bolser v. Zoning Bd., 605 P.2d 156 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). “All are in agreement that the statutory authority under which defendants enacted zoning regulations affecting plaintiffs’ land is contained in K.S.A. 19-2901 through 19-2913. K.S.A. 19-2913 provides: “That any and all acts and regulations provided for or authorized by this act…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.