Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 19-2908 (2026)

Zoning regulations inapplicable to existing structures or agricultural land; exceptions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

19-2908. Zoning regulations inapplicable to existing structures or agricultural land; exceptions. Regulations adopted under authority of this act shall not apply to existing structures nor to the existing use of any buildings or land, but shall apply to any alteration of a building to provide for its use for a purpose or in a manner different from the use to which it was put before the alteration. This act shall not prevent the restoration of a building damaged not more than fifty percent of its assessed valuation by fire, explosion, act of God, or the public enemy, or prevent the continuance of the use of such building or part thereof as such use existed at the time of such damage, or prevent a change of such existing use except under limitations provided herein in relation to existing buildings and premises. Except for flood plain regulations in areas designated as a flood plain, regulations adopted pursuant to this act shall not apply to the use of land for agricultural purposes, nor for the erection or maintenance of buildings thereon for such purposes so long as such land and buildings erected thereon are used for agricultural purposes and not otherwise. No plat nor dedication of any such land for public purposes may be made without submission to the zoning board and the approval of the county commissioners.

History: L. 1939, ch. 165, § 8; L. 1941, ch. 196, § 3; L. 1991, ch. 63, § 4; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–2006 · leading case: Weber v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 884 P.2d 1159 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).
Weber v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 884 P.2d 1159 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 3× “12-758, K.S.A. 19-2908, K.S.A. 19-2921 and K.S.A.”
State v. Scherer, 721 P.2d 743 (Kan. Ct. App. 1986). “(We note that although Scherer was charged with violating the 1959 regulations, there is no evidence in the record of any prohibited uses prior to 1977, at which time the 1975 regulations were in effect.) Scherer next argues the court erred in failing to instruct the jury that…”
Seward Cnty. ex rel. Seward Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. Navarro, 133 P.3d 1283 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “S.A. 12-741(a). However, this authority shall not apply to the use of land for agricultural purposes or to buildings erected on the land for agricultural purposes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.