K.S.A. » Chapter 19
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 19-2920 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

19-2920.

History: L. 1939, ch. 164, § 7; L. 1941, ch. 197, § 8; L. 1965, ch. 178, § 10; L. 1981, ch. 123, § 1; L. 1982, ch. 124, § 1; L. 1983, ch. 103, § 1; L. 1990, ch. 89, § 2; Repealed, L. 1991, ch. 56, § 28; January 1, 1992.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Parol evidence to show vote of board not unanimous for proposed rezoning. Ertl v. Board of County Commissioners, 211 Kan. 202, 505 P.2d 700.

2. Zoning not a condition precedent to electric utility exercising power of eminent domain under K.S.A. 17-618. Concerned Citizens, United, Inc. v. Kansas Power and Light Co., 215 Kan. 218, 232, 235, 523 P.2d 755.

3. Cited; a public hearing is a prerequisite for proposed amendments to township zoning regulations. Reeves v. Board of Johnson County Comm'rs., 226 Kan. 397, 402, 602 P.2d 93.

4. Unanimous vote required hereunder after protest filed against zoning change does not alter scope of judicial review. Combined Investment Co. v. Board of Butler County Comm'rs., 227 Kan. 17, 18, 29, 605 P.2d 533.

5. No requirement hereunder for Board of County Commissioners to determine number of meetings to be had on zoning recommendations. Board of Lincoln County Comm'rs v. Berner, 5 Kan. App. 2d 104, 105, 109, 110, 613 P.2d 676.

6. Cited in upholding constitutionality of unanimous vote requirement of K.S.A. 15-123 for incorporation of additional city. In re Application for Incorporation as City, 241 Kan. 396, 398, 399, 736 P.2d 875 (1987).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1979–1987 · leading case: Combined Inv. Co. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 605 P.2d 533 (Kan. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Combined Inv. Co. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 605 P.2d 533 (Kan. 1980). · cites it 3× “K.S.A. 19-2920. The Board, without hearing further evidence, denied the change, two members of the Board voting in favor of plaintiff’s application and one member, Commissioner Mauk, voting against it.”
Reeves v. Bd. of Johnson Cnty. Comm'rs, 602 P.2d 93 (Kan. 1979). “Likewise, K.S.A. 19-2920 requires county planning boards to conduct public hearings with notice prior to amendments in zoning regulations.”
In Re Incorporation as a City of the Third Class, 736 P.2d 875 (Kan. 1987). · cites it 2× “19-2907, K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 19-2920, and K.S.A. 75-3713 et seq.”
Bd. of Lincoln Cnty. Comm'rs v. Berner, 613 P.2d 676 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 3× “(K.S.A. 19-2920.) On May 28, 1974, the planning board adopted an “official acceptance of the Comprehensive Plan” for Lincoln County.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.