K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-2506 (2026)

Same; construction of act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-2506. Same; construction of act. It is hereby declared that this act is for the public safety, peace and welfare of the state, is remedial in nature, shall be construed liberally, and in case any part thereof shall be declared unconstitutional it shall not in any way affect any other part hereof.

History: L. 1931, ch. 178, § 6; March 16.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2021 · leading case: State v. Stoll, 480 P.3d 158 (Kan. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Stoll, 480 P.3d 158 (Kan. 2021). “, K.S.A. 21-2506 (stating statutes relating to identification and detection of crimes and criminals are remedial and should be liberally construed); K.”
State v. Gaona, 270 P.3d 1165 (Kan. 2012). “21-3506(a)(1); Count Seven — aggravated criminal sodomy, on or about March 23, 2005, through December 19, 2005, in violation of K.S.A. 21-2506(a)(l). The jury convicted Gaona of the rapes charged in Counts One and Three and of the aggravated criminal sodomies charged in Counts…”
Kite's Bar & Grill, Inc. v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 329 P.3d 536 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “”); K.S.A. 21-2506 dealing with identification and detection of crimes and criminals (“It is hereby declared that this act is for the public safety, peace and welfare of the state, is remedial in nature, shall be construed liberally, and in case any part thereof shall be…”
— K.S.A. § 21-2506(a)(l) — 1 case
State v. Gaona, 270 P.3d 1165 (Kan. 2012). “21-3506(a)(1); Count Seven — aggravated criminal sodomy, on or about March 23, 2005, through December 19, 2005, in violation of K.S.A. 21-2506(a)(l). The jury convicted Gaona of the rapes charged in Counts One and Three and of the aggravated criminal sodomies charged in Counts…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.