K.S.A. » Chapter 21

K.S.A. § 21-3447

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3447.

History: L. 2005, ch. 200, § 3; L. 2006, ch. 212, § 10; L. 2010, ch. 109, § 4, L. 2010, ch. 155, § 3; Repealed, L. 2011, ch. 30, § 288; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Aggravated trafficking statute not unconstitutionally overbroad or vague. State v. Williams, 46 Kan. App. 2d 36, 257 P.3d 849 (2011).

2. Crimes of aggravated trafficking and promoting prostitution did not have identical elements for sentencing purposes. State v. Williams, 46 Kan. App. 2d 36, 257 P.3d 849 (2011).

3. Offenses of promoting prostitution and aggravated trafficking are not identical offenses and, therefore, identical offense sentencing doctrine does not apply. State v. Williams, 299 Kan. 911, 928, 329 P.3d 400 (2014).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2011–2024 · leading case: State v. Williams
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Williams (2014) kan · cites it 27× “21-3446, defining the elements of trafficking, and K.S.A. 21-3447, defining the elements of aggravated trafficking, provides guidance.”
State v. Williams (2011) kanctapp · cites it 23× “See K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 21-3447. At trial, Williams admitted that he had been in Dallas during the time alleged by L.”
State v. Prine (2013) kan · cites it 2× ““(g) As used in this section, an “act or offense of sexual misconduct” includes: (1) Any conduct proscribed by article 35 of chapter 21 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated, and amendments thereto; (2) the sexual gratification component of aggravated trafficking, as described in…”
State v. Breeden (2013) kan · cites it 2× “21-6419 through 21-6421, and amendments thereto; (2) the sexual gratification component of aggravated human trafficking, as described in subsection (a)(1)(B) and (a)(2) of K.S.A. 21-3447, prior to its repeal, or subsection (b)(1)(B) or (b)(2) of K.”
State v. Spencer (2011) kan · cites it 2× “The statutory canon of construction known as the rule of lenity compels the answer to the next question: What is the applicable grid box? As referenced above, both the definitional statutes for Jessica's Law crimes—see K.S.A. 21-3447 (aggravated trafficking); K.”
State v. Scheetz (2023) kanctapp · cites it 4× “21-6419 through 21-6422, and amendments thereto; (2) the sexual gratification component of aggravated human trafficking, as described in K.S.A. 21-3447(a)(1)(B) or (a)(2), prior to its repeal, or K.”
Williams v. State (2024) kanctapp · cites it 10× “Williams now claimed that aggravated trafficking under K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 21-3447(a) required the State to prove the elements of simple trafficking under K.”
Neloms v. State (2021) kanctapp · cites it 3× “In the motion, he argued: (1) He was charged with a nonexistent crime because the statute under which he was charged (K.S.A. 21-3447, aggravated human trafficking) was repealed July 1, 2011; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the truthfulness of the…”
— K.S.A. § 21-3447(a) — 1 case
Williams v. State (2024) kanctapp “Williams now claimed that aggravated trafficking under K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 21-3447(a) required the State to prove the elements of simple trafficking under K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3447(a)(1) — 1 case
Williams v. State (2024) kanctapp “Williams now claimed that aggravated trafficking under K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 21-3447(a) required the State to prove the elements of simple trafficking under K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3447(a)(1)(B) — 1 case
State v. Scheetz (2023) kanctapp “21-6419 through 21-6422, and amendments thereto; (2) the sexual gratification component of aggravated human trafficking, as described in K.S.A. 21-3447(a)(1)(B) or (a)(2), prior to its repeal, or K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3447(a)(2) — 3 cases
State v. Williams (2014) kan “21-3446, defining the elements of trafficking, and K.S.A. 21-3447, defining the elements of aggravated trafficking, provides guidance.”
State v. Williams (2011) kanctapp “See K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 21-3447. At trial, Williams admitted that he had been in Dallas during the time alleged by L.”
Williams v. State (2024) kanctapp “Williams now claimed that aggravated trafficking under K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 21-3447(a) required the State to prove the elements of simple trafficking under K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3447(b) — 1 case
State v. Williams (2014) kan “21-3446, defining the elements of trafficking, and K.S.A. 21-3447, defining the elements of aggravated trafficking, provides guidance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.