K.S.A. » Chapter 21

K.S.A. § 21-3503

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3503.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3503; L. 1975, ch. 193, § 1; L. 1983, ch. 109, § 3; L. 1984, ch. 118, § 1; L. 1985, ch. 109, § 2; L. 1987, ch. 108, § 1; L. 1989, ch. 89, § 1; L. 1993, ch. 253, § 3; L. 1993, ch. 253, § 4; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 157 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1973–2022 · leading case: State v. Fierro
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Fierro (1995) kan · cites it 18× “He pleaded nolo contendere to six counts of attempted indecent liberties with a child in violation of K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-3503 and K.S.A. 1992 Supp.”
State v. Fike (1988) kan · cites it 10× “This is evidenced in part by K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 21-3503(l)(b). The majority errs in stating no crime would be committed under either K.”
State v. Jackson (1986) kan · cites it 8× “: Defendant David Jackson appeals from his conviction by jury trial in Linn County of two counts of indecent liberties with a child, K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-3503, and one count of aggravated criminal sodomy, K.”
State v. Clements (1987) kan · cites it 6× “21-3506) or indecent liberties with a child (K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-3503[1][b]), and that the offenses are identical, the only difference being that the former is a class B felony and the latter is a class C felony.”
State v. Nunn (1989) kan · cites it 4× “The appellant argues that from September 1, 1984, until the statute was amended on July 1, 1985, the conduct with which appellant was charged in Count VII was proscribed by both the aggravated criminal sodomy statute (K.”
State v. Bryan (2006) kan · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 21-3503. In addition, indecent hberties requires a touching, a fondling, or a solicitation to touch or fondle.”
Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County (1981) scotus · cites it 2× “See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-3503 (1974); Mass. Gen.”
State Ex Rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer (1993) kan · cites it 5× “On January 15, 1991, the district attorney’s office of Shawnee County filed a petition requesting that Colleen Hermesmann be adjudicated as a juvenile offender for engaging in the act of sexual intercourse with a child under the age of 16, Shanandoah (Shane) Seyer, to whom she…”
State v. Wells (1977) kan · cites it 5× “(K.S.A. 1975 Supp. 21-3503.) The facts in the case are substantially as follows: The defendant-appellant, Charles V.”
State v. Williams (1992) kan · cites it 3× “Williams was charged with one count of indecent liberties with a child, K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 21-3503. The charge arose after S.”
Wilson v. State (2003) kanctapp · cites it 4× “" K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-3503. As the Supreme Court could not divine legislative intent when faced with two statutes that were identical as to elements, the common sense result was to conclude only the lesser penalty could be imposed to prevent arbitrary charging by prosecutors.”
State v. Riolo (2014) kanctapp · cites it 4× “Both parties, as well as the district court, appear to agree that the most similar of our Kansas offenses is indecent liberties with a child, found at the time in K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 21-3503. That statute reads: “Indecent liberties with a child is engaging in any of the following…”
Show all 157 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(1) — 11 cases
State v. Clements (1987) kan “21-3506) or indecent liberties with a child (K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-3503[1][b]), and that the offenses are identical, the only difference being that the former is a class B felony and the latter is a class C felony.”
State v. Belcher (2000) kan
Williams v. Darr (1979) kanctapp
State v. Coberly (1983) kan
State v. Peltier (1991) kan
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(1)(a) — 1 case
State v. Fulcher (1987) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(1)(b) — 4 cases
Wilson v. State (2003) kanctapp “" K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-3503. As the Supreme Court could not divine legislative intent when faced with two statutes that were identical as to elements, the common sense result was to conclude only the lesser penalty could be imposed to prevent arbitrary charging by prosecutors.”
State v. Sandberg (2010) kan
In Re Mary P. (1985) kan
State v. Fulcher (1987) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(3) — 1 case
Seaton v. State (2000) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(a) — 7 cases
State v. Myers (1996) kan
State v. Rutherford (2008) kanctapp
State v. Jones (2001) kan
State v. Hart (2010) kanctapp
State v. Risinger (2008) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(a)(1) — 5 cases
Farris v. McKune (1996) kan
State v. Hart (2010) kanctapp
State v. Diaz (2010) kanctapp
State v. Chrisco (1999) kanctapp
Doe v. Thompson (2016) kan
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(a)(3)(A) — 1 case
State v. Alvis (2002) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(a)(l) — 5 cases
State v. Richardson (2009) kan
State v. Ward (1994) kanctapp
State v. Price (1997) kanctapp
Doe v. Thompson (2016) kan
State v. Rodriguez (1997) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(b) — 2 cases
State v. Moore (2002) kan
State v. Limon (2004) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(c) — 3 cases
State v. Ward (1994) kanctapp
State v. Moore (2022) kanctapp
Ploeckelmann v. Finney (1997) ksd
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(e) — 1 case
Ploeckelmann v. Finney (1997) ksd
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(a) — 6 cases
State v. Nunn (1989) kan “The appellant argues that from September 1, 1984, until the statute was amended on July 1, 1985, the conduct with which appellant was charged in Count VII was proscribed by both the aggravated criminal sodomy statute (K.”
In re Kline (2013) kan
State v. Fike (1988) kan “This is evidenced in part by K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 21-3503(l)(b). The majority errs in stating no crime would be committed under either K.”
State Ex Rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer (1993) kan “On January 15, 1991, the district attorney’s office of Shawnee County filed a petition requesting that Colleen Hermesmann be adjudicated as a juvenile offender for engaging in the act of sexual intercourse with a child under the age of 16, Shanandoah (Shane) Seyer, to whom she…”
State v. Kilpatrick (1978) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(b) — 17 cases
State v. Fike (1988) kan “This is evidenced in part by K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 21-3503(l)(b). The majority errs in stating no crime would be committed under either K.”
State v. Nunn (1989) kan “The appellant argues that from September 1, 1984, until the statute was amended on July 1, 1985, the conduct with which appellant was charged in Count VII was proscribed by both the aggravated criminal sodomy statute (K.”
State v. Jackson (1986) kan “: Defendant David Jackson appeals from his conviction by jury trial in Linn County of two counts of indecent liberties with a child, K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-3503, and one count of aggravated criminal sodomy, K.”
State v. Riolo (2014) kanctapp “Both parties, as well as the district court, appear to agree that the most similar of our Kansas offenses is indecent liberties with a child, found at the time in K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 21-3503. That statute reads: “Indecent liberties with a child is engaging in any of the following…”
State v. Dinh Loc Ta (2012) kan
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(c) — 1 case
State v. Jackson (1986) kan “: Defendant David Jackson appeals from his conviction by jury trial in Linn County of two counts of indecent liberties with a child, K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-3503, and one count of aggravated criminal sodomy, K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(fe) — 1 case
State v. Boling (1980) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(h) — 1 case
State v. Voiles (1979) kan
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(o) — 1 case
State v. Boling (1980) kanctapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.