Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-3522 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3522.

History: L. 1999, ch. 164, § 38; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2001–2021 · leading case: State v. Limon, 83 P.3d 229 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).
State v. Limon, 83 P.3d 229 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 106× “Limon argued that K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-3522(a)(2) was unconstitutional because it impermissibly discriminated between heterosexual and homosexual sodomy.”
State v. Limon, 122 P.3d 22 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 11× “: The principal issue presented in this case is whether the Kansas unlawful voluntary sexual relations statute, K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-3522, violates the equal protection provision of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”
State v. Ussery, 116 P.3d 735 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 5× “21-3511 (aggravated indecent solicitation of a child);' K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-3522 (unlawful, voluntary sexual relations).”
State v. Haney, 116 P.3d 747 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “21-3511 (aggravated indecent solicitation of a child); K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-3522 (unlawful voluntary sexual relations).”
In re A.B., 484 P.3d 226 (Kan. 2021). · cites it 3× “Appeal from Clay District Court; JOHN F. BOSCH, judge. Opinion filed April 2, 2021.”
State v. Mossman, 281 P.3d 153 (Kan. 2012). “21-3520(a); K.S.A. 21-3522(a); see also State v. Limon, 280 Kan.”
Aid for Women v. Foulston, 441 F.3d 1101 (10th Cir. 2006). “, Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-3522 . . To satisfy their burden of proof and obtain a preliminary injunction, Plaintiffs need only show "by clear proof” that they "probably [will] prevail when the merits are tried.”
State v. Breeden, 304 P.3d 660 (Kan. 2013). “21-3520[a]; K.S.A. 21-3522[a]); see State v. Limon, 280 Kan.”
In re E.R., 197 P.3d 870 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 5× “K.S.A. 21-3522(a) provides: “Unlawful voluntary sexual relations is engaging in voluntary.”
Aid for Women v. Foulston, 327 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (D. Kan. 2004). · cites it 2× “” K.S.A. § 21-3522(a). Sodomy is defined to include “any oral contact or oral penetration of the female genitalia or oral contact of the male genitalia.”
State v. Edwards, 288 P.3d 494 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). “*277 Equally important is the fact that a different statute, K.S.A. 21-3522, makes voluntary sexual relations with children younger than 16 a crime.”
People v. Hofsheier, 129 P.3d 29 (Cal. 2006). · cites it 2× “) A different statute (Kan.Stat.Ann. § 21-3522) prohibited heterosexual sodomy with a minor 14 or 15 years old, but it prescribed a lesser penalty and did not require registration as a sex offender.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3522(a) — 5 cases
State v. Mossman, 281 P.3d 153 (Kan. 2012). “21-3520(a); K.S.A. 21-3522(a); see also State v. Limon, 280 Kan.”
Aid for Women v. Foulston, 327 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (D. Kan. 2004). “” K.S.A. § 21-3522(a). Sodomy is defined to include “any oral contact or oral penetration of the female genitalia or oral contact of the male genitalia.”
In re E.R., 197 P.3d 870 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). “K.S.A. 21-3522(a) provides: “Unlawful voluntary sexual relations is engaging in voluntary.”
In re A.B., 484 P.3d 226 (Kan. 2021). “Appeal from Clay District Court; JOHN F. BOSCH, judge. Opinion filed April 2, 2021.”
In Re Er, 197 P.3d 870 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-3522(a)(2) — 1 case
State v. Limon, 83 P.3d 229 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “Limon argued that K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-3522(a)(2) was unconstitutional because it impermissibly discriminated between heterosexual and homosexual sodomy.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3522(a)(3) — 2 cases
In re E.R., 197 P.3d 870 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). “K.S.A. 21-3522(a) provides: “Unlawful voluntary sexual relations is engaging in voluntary.”
In Re Er, 197 P.3d 870 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-3522(a)(l) — 2 cases
State v. Ussery, 116 P.3d 735 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “21-3511 (aggravated indecent solicitation of a child);' K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-3522 (unlawful, voluntary sexual relations).”
State v. Haney, 116 P.3d 747 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “21-3511 (aggravated indecent solicitation of a child); K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-3522 (unlawful voluntary sexual relations).”
— K.S.A. § 21-3522(b)(2) — 1 case
State v. Limon, 83 P.3d 229 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “Limon argued that K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-3522(a)(2) was unconstitutional because it impermissibly discriminated between heterosexual and homosexual sodomy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.