K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4607 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4607.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4607; L. 1986, ch. 123, § 8; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: State v. Raschke, 219 P.3d 481 (Kan. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Raschke, 219 P.3d 481 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 14× “3d 174 (2008), requires grafting K.S.A. 21-4607’s requirement for an examination of the defendant’s financial circumstances onto the forgery statute, even when the only fine being set is tire mandatory minimum.”
State v. Copes, 224 P.3d 571 (Kan. 2010). · cites it 19× “3d 481 (2009) (considering K.S.A. 21-4607 and fine provision); Robinson, 281 Kan.”
State v. Robinson, 132 P.3d 934 (Kan. 2006). · cites it 4× “Robinson's argument based on McGlothlin and K.S.A. 21-4607 is without merit. The BIDS fees at issue here are not intended to be punitive; they are not fines or, indeed, any part of the punishment or sanction for the defendant's criminal conduct.”
State v. Robinson, 109 P.3d 185 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 14× “The inclusion of the waiver language in this statute precludes the trial court from having to make findings before taxation, unlike K.S.A. 21-4607, which has no such waiver provision.”
State v. Adame, 257 P.3d 1266 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 12× “40-3104(g)(1), the sentencing court should have taken each option into consideration, keeping in mind all the criteria for imposing a fine in K.S.A. 21-4607. K.S.A. 21-4607(1) states: “When the law authorizes any other disposition, a fine shall not be imposed as the sole and…”
State v. Shively, 987 P.2d 1119 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 7× “Sentencing Requirements Lastly, Shively claims the trial court failed to comply with the sentencing requirements of K.S.A. 21-4607. K.S.A. 21-4607(2) limits the imposition of fines on individuals sentenced to imprisonment to circumstances in which the defendant derived pecuniary…”
State v. Dukes, 174 P.3d 914 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 3× “The Fine Imposed on Defendant Must Be Vacated Because the District Court Imposed More than the Minimum Fine without Making the Findings Required by K.S.A. 21-4607. Dukes’ conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol was his third for that offense.”
State v. Shuster, 829 P.2d 925 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 8× “Neither at the sentencing hearing nor in the journal entry did the trial court expressly discuss the factors of K.S.A. 21-4607 necessary for imposing a fine in addition to incarceration.”
State v. Tafoya, 372 P.3d 1247 (Kan. 2016). “Consequently, applying K.S.A. 21-4607(3) we hold that a district court must take into account the defendant’s financial resources and the burden of the fine when considering the method of payment of a fine for a fourth or subsequent DUI offense, i.”
State v. McGlothlin, 747 P.2d 1335 (Kan. 1988). · cites it 2× “” K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 21-4607: “Criteria for imposing fines.”
State v. Greenlee, 620 P.2d 1132 (Kan. 1980). “21-4606 sets forth factors to be considered in fixing minimum terms; K.S.A. 21-4607 establishes factors for imposing fines; K.”
State v. Keeley, 694 P.2d 422 (Kan. 1985). “K.S.A. 21-4607 provides criteria for imposing fines.”
Show all 27 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-4607(1) — 2 cases
State v. Robinson, 109 P.3d 185 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “The inclusion of the waiver language in this statute precludes the trial court from having to make findings before taxation, unlike K.S.A. 21-4607, which has no such waiver provision.”
State v. Adame, 257 P.3d 1266 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “40-3104(g)(1), the sentencing court should have taken each option into consideration, keeping in mind all the criteria for imposing a fine in K.S.A. 21-4607. K.S.A. 21-4607(1) states: “When the law authorizes any other disposition, a fine shall not be imposed as the sole and…”
— K.S.A. § 21-4607(2) — 7 cases
State v. Shively, 987 P.2d 1119 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “Sentencing Requirements Lastly, Shively claims the trial court failed to comply with the sentencing requirements of K.S.A. 21-4607. K.S.A. 21-4607(2) limits the imposition of fines on individuals sentenced to imprisonment to circumstances in which the defendant derived pecuniary…”
State v. Robinson, 109 P.3d 185 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “The inclusion of the waiver language in this statute precludes the trial court from having to make findings before taxation, unlike K.S.A. 21-4607, which has no such waiver provision.”
State v. McGlothlin, 747 P.2d 1335 (Kan. 1988). “” K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 21-4607: “Criteria for imposing fines.”
State v. Adame, 257 P.3d 1266 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “40-3104(g)(1), the sentencing court should have taken each option into consideration, keeping in mind all the criteria for imposing a fine in K.S.A. 21-4607. K.S.A. 21-4607(1) states: “When the law authorizes any other disposition, a fine shall not be imposed as the sole and…”
State v. Edwards, 9 P.3d 568 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
— K.S.A. § 21-4607(2)(a) — 1 case
State v. Adame, 257 P.3d 1266 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “40-3104(g)(1), the sentencing court should have taken each option into consideration, keeping in mind all the criteria for imposing a fine in K.S.A. 21-4607. K.S.A. 21-4607(1) states: “When the law authorizes any other disposition, a fine shall not be imposed as the sole and…”
— K.S.A. § 21-4607(2)(b) — 1 case
State v. Adame, 257 P.3d 1266 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “40-3104(g)(1), the sentencing court should have taken each option into consideration, keeping in mind all the criteria for imposing a fine in K.S.A. 21-4607. K.S.A. 21-4607(1) states: “When the law authorizes any other disposition, a fine shall not be imposed as the sole and…”
— K.S.A. § 21-4607(3) — 17 cases
State v. Copes, 224 P.3d 571 (Kan. 2010). “3d 481 (2009) (considering K.S.A. 21-4607 and fine provision); Robinson, 281 Kan.”
State v. Raschke, 219 P.3d 481 (Kan. 2009). “3d 174 (2008), requires grafting K.S.A. 21-4607’s requirement for an examination of the defendant’s financial circumstances onto the forgery statute, even when the only fine being set is tire mandatory minimum.”
State v. Robinson, 132 P.3d 934 (Kan. 2006). “Robinson's argument based on McGlothlin and K.S.A. 21-4607 is without merit. The BIDS fees at issue here are not intended to be punitive; they are not fines or, indeed, any part of the punishment or sanction for the defendant's criminal conduct.”
State v. Adame, 257 P.3d 1266 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “40-3104(g)(1), the sentencing court should have taken each option into consideration, keeping in mind all the criteria for imposing a fine in K.S.A. 21-4607. K.S.A. 21-4607(1) states: “When the law authorizes any other disposition, a fine shall not be imposed as the sole and…”
State v. Robinson, 109 P.3d 185 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “The inclusion of the waiver language in this statute precludes the trial court from having to make findings before taxation, unlike K.S.A. 21-4607, which has no such waiver provision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.