K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4610 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4610.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4610; L. 1972, ch. 317, § 100; L. 1976, ch. 169, § 1; L. 1978, ch. 120, § 9; L. 1981, ch. 147, § 1; L. 1983, ch. 112, § 1; L. 1984, ch. 126, § 2; L. 1986, ch. 128, § 2; L. 1986, ch. 123, § 10; L. 1986, ch. 136, § 2; L. 1988, ch. 115, § 9; L. 1991, ch. 88, § 3; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 244; L. 1993, ch. 259, § 14; L. 1995, ch. 257, § 2; L. 1997, ch. 181, § 19; L. 2000, ch. 182, § 5; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 88 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1979–2024 · leading case: State v. Hunziker, 56 P.3d 202 (Kan. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Hunziker, 56 P.3d 202 (Kan. 2002). · cites it 15× “Hunziker argues that, under K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4610(c)(8), State v.”
State v. Robinson, 132 P.3d 934 (Kan. 2006). · cites it 6× “" Robinson also calls our attention to K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 21-4610(d)(3). That statute states: "(d) In addition to any other conditions of probation, suspension of sentence or assignment to a community correctional services program, the court shall order the defendant to .”
State v. Gary, 144 P.3d 634 (Kan. 2006). · cites it 8× “If that were the case, we would apply the abuse of discretion standard advanced by the State. What we have here is a question of whether a violation of the law, not a condition of probation, may nevertheless support the revocation of probation or provide a district court with…”
State v. Hall, 319 P.3d 506 (Kan. 2014). · cites it 5× “at 739 (addressing K.S.A. 21-4610[d][l]; lynchpin causation).”
State v. Gumfory, 135 P.3d 1191 (Kan. 2006). · cites it 4× “The State points to K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 21-4610, conditions of probation or suspended sentence, which mandates obedience to the laws of Kansas as a condition of probation: “(a) Except as required by this subsection and subsection (d), nothing in this section shall be construed to…”
State v. Hymer, 26 P.3d 63 (Kan. 2001). · cites it 16× ““Second, I do not agree with the majority’s sweeping interpretation of K.S.A. 21-4610. I recognize in State v. Ball, 255 Kan.”
State v. Hand, 257 P.3d 780 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 22× “2d 988 (The term "aggrieved party" in K.S.A. 21-4610 includes "a party secondarily aggrieved who ha[s] compensated the original aggrieved party.”
State v. Applegate, 976 P.2d 936 (Kan. 1999). · cites it 8× “The procedures for determining payment and the amount of restitution vary in federal and state jurisdictions from statutes such as K.S.A. 21-4610, which provide only a general statement of the legislature’s intent, to enactments such as 18 U.”
In Re the Marriage of Loscher, 182 P.3d 25 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 8× “The journal entry of judgment further provided that criminal restitution, as mandated under K.S.A. 21-4610(d)(1), would be ordered at a later date.”
State v. Dexter, 80 P.3d 1125 (Kan. 2003). · cites it 6× “” Second, K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4610, which governs conditions of probation, provides in relevant part: “(d) In addition to any other conditions of probation .”
State v. Bennett, 200 P.3d 455 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 4× “Standard of Review K.S.A. 21-4610 sets forth a nonexclusive list of probation conditions that a court may impose.”
State v. Beechum, 833 P.2d 988 (Kan. 1992). · cites it 9× “In Yost , we held that: "For a trial judge in a supplemental probation proceeding to substitute a newly aggrieved party for the originally aggrieved party when: The substitute party has fully paid the original party, the amount to be paid is unchanged, and the amount was never…”
Show all 88 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(3) — 3 cases
State v. Thomas, Jr., 981 P.2d 1178 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999).
State v. Petz, 7 P.3d 1277 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
State v. Winters, 966 P.2d 678 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(3)(1) — 1 case
State v. Williams, 856 P.2d 158 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(3)(i) — 1 case
State v. Williams, 856 P.2d 158 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(3)(m) — 2 cases
State v. Petz, 7 P.3d 1277 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
State v. Winters, 966 P.2d 678 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(4) — 2 cases
State v. Ball, 877 P.2d 955 (Kan. 1994).
Creamer v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 812 P.2d 330 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(4)(a) — 6 cases
State v. Beechum, 833 P.2d 988 (Kan. 1992). “In Yost , we held that: "For a trial judge in a supplemental probation proceeding to substitute a newly aggrieved party for the originally aggrieved party when: The substitute party has fully paid the original party, the amount to be paid is unchanged, and the amount was never…”
State v. Hinckley, 777 P.2d 417 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989).
State v. Applegate, 976 P.2d 936 (Kan. 1999). “The procedures for determining payment and the amount of restitution vary in federal and state jurisdictions from statutes such as K.S.A. 21-4610, which provide only a general statement of the legislature’s intent, to enactments such as 18 U.”
State v. Wells, 861 P.2d 828 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).
State v. Ball, 877 P.2d 955 (Kan. 1994).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(a) — 4 cases
State v. Gary, 144 P.3d 634 (Kan. 2006). “If that were the case, we would apply the abuse of discretion standard advanced by the State. What we have here is a question of whether a violation of the law, not a condition of probation, may nevertheless support the revocation of probation or provide a district court with…”
State v. Gumfory, 135 P.3d 1191 (Kan. 2006). “The State points to K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 21-4610, conditions of probation or suspended sentence, which mandates obedience to the laws of Kansas as a condition of probation: “(a) Except as required by this subsection and subsection (d), nothing in this section shall be construed to…”
State v. Martinez, 165 P.3d 1050 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Perry-Coutcher, 254 P.3d 556 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(b) — 4 cases
State v. Grossman, 248 P.3d 776 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Chetwood, 170 P.3d 436 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Cox, 42 P.3d 182 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Dillard, 890 P.2d 1248 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(c) — 14 cases
State v. Schad, 206 P.3d 22 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Hymer, 26 P.3d 63 (Kan. 2001). ““Second, I do not agree with the majority’s sweeping interpretation of K.S.A. 21-4610. I recognize in State v. Ball, 255 Kan.”
State v. Bennett, 200 P.3d 455 (Kan. 2009). “Standard of Review K.S.A. 21-4610 sets forth a nonexclusive list of probation conditions that a court may impose.”
State v. Spencer, 70 P.3d 1226 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
Tonge v. Werholtz, 109 P.3d 1140 (Kan. 2005).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(c)(10) — 4 cases
In re L.M., 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
In re P.R.G., 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
In Re Lm, 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
In Re Prg, 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(c)(13) — 3 cases
State v. Petz, 7 P.3d 1277 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
State v. Thomas, Jr., 981 P.2d 1178 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999).
State v. Winters, 966 P.2d 678 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(c)(14) — 4 cases
State v. Behrendt, 274 P.3d 704 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Hymer, 11 P.3d 94 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
State v. Thomas, Jr., 981 P.2d 1178 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999).
State v. Petz, 7 P.3d 1277 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(c)(4) — 2 cases
State v. Bennett, 200 P.3d 455 (Kan. 2009). “Standard of Review K.S.A. 21-4610 sets forth a nonexclusive list of probation conditions that a court may impose.”
State v. Bennett, 185 P.3d 320 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(c)(7) — 1 case
State v. Gardner, 244 P.3d 1292 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(c)(8) — 3 cases
State v. Hunziker, 56 P.3d 202 (Kan. 2002). “Hunziker argues that, under K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4610(c)(8), State v.”
State v. Windom, 932 P.2d 1019 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Loffer, 947 P.2d 458 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(c)(9) — 6 cases
In re L.M., 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
In re P.R.G., 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
State v. Theis, 936 P.2d 710 (Kan. 1997).
State v. Taylor, 6 P.3d 441 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
In Re Lm, 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(d) — 11 cases
State v. Hall, 304 P.3d 677 (Kan. 2013).
State v. Hand, 304 P.3d 1234 (Kan. 2013).
State v. Dexter, 80 P.3d 1125 (Kan. 2003). “” Second, K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4610, which governs conditions of probation, provides in relevant part: “(d) In addition to any other conditions of probation .”
State v. Hymer, 26 P.3d 63 (Kan. 2001). ““Second, I do not agree with the majority’s sweeping interpretation of K.S.A. 21-4610. I recognize in State v. Ball, 255 Kan.”
State v. Hand, 257 P.3d 780 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “2d 988 (The term "aggrieved party" in K.S.A. 21-4610 includes "a party secondarily aggrieved who ha[s] compensated the original aggrieved party.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(d)(1) — 22 cases
State v. Hunziker, 56 P.3d 202 (Kan. 2002). “Hunziker argues that, under K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4610(c)(8), State v.”
State v. Applegate, 976 P.2d 936 (Kan. 1999). “The procedures for determining payment and the amount of restitution vary in federal and state jurisdictions from statutes such as K.S.A. 21-4610, which provide only a general statement of the legislature’s intent, to enactments such as 18 U.”
In Re the Marriage of Loscher, 182 P.3d 25 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). “The journal entry of judgment further provided that criminal restitution, as mandated under K.S.A. 21-4610(d)(1), would be ordered at a later date.”
State v. Hall, 247 P.3d 1050 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Hunziker, 41 P.3d 880 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(d)(3) — 2 cases
State v. Robinson, 132 P.3d 934 (Kan. 2006). “" Robinson also calls our attention to K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 21-4610(d)(3). That statute states: "(d) In addition to any other conditions of probation, suspension of sentence or assignment to a community correctional services program, the court shall order the defendant to .”
State v. Robinson, 109 P.3d 185 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(d)(i) — 1 case
State v. Phillips, 253 P.3d 372 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(d)(l) — 21 cases
State v. Hunziker, 56 P.3d 202 (Kan. 2002). “Hunziker argues that, under K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4610(c)(8), State v.”
State v. Hall, 319 P.3d 506 (Kan. 2014). “at 739 (addressing K.S.A. 21-4610[d][l]; lynchpin causation).”
State v. Cole, 155 P.3d 739 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
In Re the Marriage of Loscher, 182 P.3d 25 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). “The journal entry of judgment further provided that criminal restitution, as mandated under K.S.A. 21-4610(d)(1), would be ordered at a later date.”
State v. Dexter, 80 P.3d 1125 (Kan. 2003). “” Second, K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4610, which governs conditions of probation, provides in relevant part: “(d) In addition to any other conditions of probation .”
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(h) — 1 case
State v. Hargis, 620 P.2d 1181 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980).
— K.S.A. § 21-4610(k) — 1 case
Simmons v. James, 467 F. Supp. 1068 (D. Kan. 1979).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.