Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4722 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4722.

History: L. 1992, ch. 239, § 22; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 267; L. 1995, ch. 121, § 3; L. 1996, ch. 148, § 1; L. 2007, ch. 197, § 3; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2023 · leading case: State v. Ballard, 218 P.3d 432 (Kan. 2009).
State v. Ballard, 218 P.3d 432 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 4× “but will be released to a mandatory period of postrelease supervision upon completion of the prison portion of their sentence as follows: “(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (D) and (E), persons sentenced for nondrug severity level 1 through 4 crimes and drug severity…”
Hogue v. Bruce, 113 P.3d 234 (Kan. 2005). “In this case, the disciplinary action clearly implicated a liberty interest by depriving Hogue of 6 months of the good time credit which he had earned as provided for in K.”
In re L.M., 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008). “K.S.A. 21-4722; K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 38-2370.”
State v. Britt, 287 P.3d 905 (Kan. 2012). “21-4704(a); K.S.A. 21-4722 (good time credit calculation).”
State v. McKnight, 257 P.3d 339 (Kan. 2011). “17(d)(l)(B), which states: “(d)(1) Persons sentenced for crimes, other than off-grid crimes, committed on or after July 1, 1993, or persons subject to subparagraph (G), will not be eligible for parole, but will be released to a mandatory period of postrelease supervision upon…”
State v. Prado, 329 P.3d 473 (Kan. 2014). “21-4706(a); K.S.A. 21-4722. The same day Prado signed the plea agreement, the district court conducted a plea hearing.”
State v. Anthony, 45 P.3d 852 (Kan. 2002). “must serve 36 months, plus the amount of good time earned and retained pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4722 and amendments thereto, on postrelease supervision.”
State v. Clemons, 45 P.3d 384 (Kan. 2002). “At best, the 732 months may be reduced by 15% for good time, K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4722(a)(2), thus reducing 61 years to just under 52 years.”
State v. Cameron, 281 P.3d 143 (Kan. 2012). “22-3717(d)(l)(G), which requires an offender convicted of a “sexually violent crime” committed after July 1, 2006, to receive lifetime postrelease supervision upon release from prison.”
Stansbury v. Hannigan, 960 P.2d 227 (Kan. 1998). “See K.S.A. 21-4722; K.S.A. 22-3725. The manner in which such credits are earned, awarded, forfeited, withheld, and accumulated by individual inmates is governed by duly authorized regulations adopted by the Department of Corrections.”
State v. Proctor, 280 P.3d 839 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). “K.S.A. 21-4722(b). There are a number of person felonies with higher severity levels than aggravated indecent solicitation, including second-degree intentional murder, severity level 1, K.”
In re P.R.G., 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “K.S.A. 21-4722; K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 38-2370.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4722(a) — 1 case
State v. Ballard, 218 P.3d 432 (Kan. 2009). “but will be released to a mandatory period of postrelease supervision upon completion of the prison portion of their sentence as follows: “(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (D) and (E), persons sentenced for nondrug severity level 1 through 4 crimes and drug severity…”
— K.S.A. § 21-4722(a)(2) — 3 cases
Hogue v. Bruce, 113 P.3d 234 (Kan. 2005). “In this case, the disciplinary action clearly implicated a liberty interest by depriving Hogue of 6 months of the good time credit which he had earned as provided for in K.”
State v. Clemons, 45 P.3d 384 (Kan. 2002). “At best, the 732 months may be reduced by 15% for good time, K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4722(a)(2), thus reducing 61 years to just under 52 years.”
In re D.T.J., 148 P.3d 574 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006).
— K.S.A. § 21-4722(a)(l) — 1 case
In re D.T.J., 148 P.3d 574 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006).
— K.S.A. § 21-4722(b) — 3 cases
State v. Proctor, 280 P.3d 839 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). “K.S.A. 21-4722(b). There are a number of person felonies with higher severity levels than aggravated indecent solicitation, including second-degree intentional murder, severity level 1, K.”
Phillpot v. Shelton, 875 P.2d 289 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).
Muir v. Bruce, 18 P.3d 247 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).
— K.S.A. § 21-4722(c) — 2 cases
State v. Ballard, 218 P.3d 432 (Kan. 2009). “but will be released to a mandatory period of postrelease supervision upon completion of the prison portion of their sentence as follows: “(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (D) and (E), persons sentenced for nondrug severity level 1 through 4 crimes and drug severity…”
State v. Anthony, 42 P.3d 207 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.