Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 21-4728 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
21-4728.
History: L. 1992, ch. 239, § 302; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1995–2000 · leading case: State v. Rodriguez, 8 P.3d 712 (Kan. 2000).
State v. Rodriguez, 8 P.3d 712 (Kan. 2000). “Rodriguez also relies on the language of K.S.A. 21-4728 which states that a sentencing court “should consider in all cases a range of alternatives with gradations of supervisory, supportive and custodial facilities at its disposal so as to permit a sentence appropriate for each…”
State v. Minor, 997 P.2d 648 (Kan. 2000). “He contends K.S.A. 21-4728 states the KSGA should "permit a sentence appropriate for each individual case," and points out that one of the purposes of the sentencing guidelines was to reduce prison overcrowding by reserving space in prison for serious and violent offenders who…”
State v. Sampsel, 997 P.2d 664 (Kan. 2000). “215 , pointing out that K.S.A. 21-4728 states the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act should "permit a sentence appropriate for each individual case," and argues one of the purposes of sentencing guidelines is to reduce prison overcrowding by reserving space in prison for…”
State v. Grady, 900 P.2d 227 (Kan. 1995). “K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 21-4728 states, “The sentencing court should consider in all cases a range of alternatives with gradations of supervisory, supportive and custodial facilities at its disposal so as to permit a sentence appropriate for each individual case, consistent with…”
State v. Patry, 967 P.2d 737 (Kan. 1998). “21-4701 through K.S.A. 21-4728 govern because Patry’s acts occurred after enactment of the KSGA.”
State v. Windom, 932 P.2d 1019 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “21-4719(a) — when a departure sentence is appropriate, the sentencing judge may depart; and (4) K.S.A. 21-4728 — the sentencing court should consider a range of alternatives in all cases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.