Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 33-210 (2026)

Supplementary provisions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

33-210. Supplementary provisions. Unless displaced by the provisions of this act, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency or other validating or invalidating cause, supplement its provisions.

History: L. 1998, ch. 13, § 10; January 1, 1999.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2017–2017 · leading case: Redmond v. NCMIC Fin. Corp. (In re Brooke Corp.), 568 B.R. 378 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Redmond v. NCMIC Fin. Corp. (In re Brooke Corp.), 568 B.R. 378 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2017). “For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that: (1) NCMIC’s motion for judgment under Rule 52(c) is denied; (2) the Trustee’s motion for judgment under Rule 52(c) on NCMIC’s counterclaims is granted; (3) the Trustee has sustained his burden of proof under §§ 544 and 548 and…”

Harder v. Foster (Kan. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “" K.S.A. 33-210. Therefore, the third-party litigant exception to the American rule is applicable to UFTA cases.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.