K.S.A. » Chapter 38
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1683 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1683.

History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 114; L. 1986, ch. 115, § 83; L. 1994, ch. 282, § 10; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 169, § 140; January 1, 2007.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Provision that appeal to district court from multistate court to be heard de novo in 30 days is directory not mandatory; statute is not intended to be codification of right to speedy trial. In re T.K., 11 Kan. App. 2d 632, 634, 635, 636, 637, 731 P.2d 887 (1987).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2021 · leading case: State v. Hartpence, 42 P.3d 1197 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Hartpence, 42 P.3d 1197 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “38-1681 applies only to decisions concerning a determination that a juvenile should be prosecuted as an adult. K.S.A. 38~1681(a)(1) states that the appeal shall be only after a conviction and in the same manner as other criminal appeals.”
Foster v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 130 P.3d 560 (Kan. 2006). “2d 887 (1987), dismissal for failure to conduct a de novo review hearing within 30 days as provided in K.S.A. 38-1683(a) was before the Court of Appeals.”
In the Interest of T.K., 731 P.2d 887 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 7× “’s attorney filed a motion to dismiss for failure to hold the de novo hearing *634 within 30 days of the appeal under K.S.A. 38-1683(a). Nothing further occurred in the case until February 5, 1986, when the district judge sent a letter to the parties affirming the adjudication…”
In re I.A., 491 P.3d 1241 (Kan. 2021). “Although not made here, we can foresee arguments about why Mathews should apply, at least in some cases or as to some issues.”
In re J.A.B., 77 P.3d 156 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 38-1683(a) provides for an expedited appeal of a juvenile adjudication from a magistrate decision, requiring the appeal to be heard within 30 days of the filing of the notice of appeal.”
In the Interest of B.H., 80 P.3d 396 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003). “2d 887 (1987), the court held the 30-day time period under K.S.A. 38-1683(a) was directory, not mandatoiy.”
In Re Tk, 731 P.2d 887 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 7× “'s attorney filed a motion to dismiss for failure to hold the de novo hearing *634 within 30 days of the appeal under K.S.A. 38-1683(a). Nothing further occurred in the case until February 5, 1986, when the district judge sent a letter to the parties affirming the adjudication…”
In re R.L.C., 978 P.2d 285 (Kan. 1999). · cites it 2× “38-1682, and K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 38-1683 but does not reference a judgment of dismissal.”
In re D.T.J., 148 P.3d 574 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “60-2101(b); K.S.A. 38-1683(b) (procedure on appeal under the Kansas Juvenile Justice Code, K.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1683(a) — 6 cases
Foster v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 130 P.3d 560 (Kan. 2006). “2d 887 (1987), dismissal for failure to conduct a de novo review hearing within 30 days as provided in K.S.A. 38-1683(a) was before the Court of Appeals.”
State v. Hartpence, 42 P.3d 1197 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “38-1681 applies only to decisions concerning a determination that a juvenile should be prosecuted as an adult. K.S.A. 38~1681(a)(1) states that the appeal shall be only after a conviction and in the same manner as other criminal appeals.”
In the Interest of T.K., 731 P.2d 887 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “’s attorney filed a motion to dismiss for failure to hold the de novo hearing *634 within 30 days of the appeal under K.S.A. 38-1683(a). Nothing further occurred in the case until February 5, 1986, when the district judge sent a letter to the parties affirming the adjudication…”
In the Interest of B.H., 80 P.3d 396 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003). “2d 887 (1987), the court held the 30-day time period under K.S.A. 38-1683(a) was directory, not mandatoiy.”
In re J.A.B., 77 P.3d 156 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003). “K.S.A. 38-1683(a) provides for an expedited appeal of a juvenile adjudication from a magistrate decision, requiring the appeal to be heard within 30 days of the filing of the notice of appeal.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1683(b) — 6 cases
In re I.A., 491 P.3d 1241 (Kan. 2021). “Although not made here, we can foresee arguments about why Mathews should apply, at least in some cases or as to some issues.”
In re J.A.B., 77 P.3d 156 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003). “K.S.A. 38-1683(a) provides for an expedited appeal of a juvenile adjudication from a magistrate decision, requiring the appeal to be heard within 30 days of the filing of the notice of appeal.”
In the Interest of T.K., 731 P.2d 887 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “’s attorney filed a motion to dismiss for failure to hold the de novo hearing *634 within 30 days of the appeal under K.S.A. 38-1683(a). Nothing further occurred in the case until February 5, 1986, when the district judge sent a letter to the parties affirming the adjudication…”
In re D.T.J., 148 P.3d 574 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “60-2101(b); K.S.A. 38-1683(b) (procedure on appeal under the Kansas Juvenile Justice Code, K.”
In re R.L.C., 978 P.2d 285 (Kan. 1999). “38-1682, and K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 38-1683 but does not reference a judgment of dismissal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.