Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 39-755 (2026)

Actions by secretary to establish parentage and to enforce support rights; necessary parties to proceedings; counsel; orders; application of section

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

39-755. Actions by secretary to establish parentage and to enforce support rights; necessary parties to proceedings; counsel; orders; application of section. (a) In cases where the secretary for children and families is deemed to have an assignment of support rights in accordance with the provisions of K.S.A. 39-709, and amendments thereto, the secretary is authorized to bring a civil action in the name of the state of Kansas or of the obligee whose support rights are assigned to enforce such support rights, establish an order for medical support and, when appropriate or necessary, to establish the parentage of a child. The secretary may also enforce any assigned support order or file a motion to modify any such order.

(b) The secretary for children and families shall be deemed to hold the interests of all persons, officials and agencies having an interest in the assignment. The court shall determine, in accordance with applicable provisions of law, the parties necessary to the proceeding and whether independent counsel should be appointed to represent any party to the assignment or any other person having an interest in the support right. In any action or proceeding brought by the secretary for children and families to establish paternity or to establish, modify or enforce a support obligation, the department for children and families' attorney or the attorneys with whom the agency contracts to provide legal services shall represent the Kansas department for children and families. Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify any statutory mandate, authority or confidentiality required by any governmental agency. Any representation by such attorney shall not be construed to create an attorney-client relationship between the attorney and any party other than the Kansas department for children and families.

(c) Any support order made by the court in such a proceeding shall direct that payments be made to the secretary for children and families so long as there is in effect an assignment of support rights to the secretary and, upon notification by the secretary to the court that the assignment is terminated, that payments be made to the person or family.

(d) The provisions of this section shall also apply to cases brought by the secretary on behalf of persons who have applied for services pursuant to K.S.A. 39-756, and amendments thereto.

(e) In all child support actions initiated before the effective date of the governor's 2012 executive reorganization order 41, whenever the department of social and rehabilitation services, or words of like effect, are referred to or designated in case names and captions, pleadings, and all filings of any kind used by the department for children and families in the ordinary course of business with any court, business, agency, person or political subdivision of this state, such reference or designation shall be deemed to apply to the Kansas department for children and families.

History: L. 1976, ch. 210, § 4; L. 1980, ch. 125, § 3; L. 1985, ch. 115, § 46; L. 1986, ch. 137, § 24; L. 1994, ch. 292, § 13; L. 2014, ch. 115, § 87; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1979–2010 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Castro, 684 P.2d 379 (Kan. 1984).
State Ex Rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Castro, 684 P.2d 379 (Kan. 1984). · cites it 5× “39-718a and K.S.A. 39-755. In the petition, it was alleged that SRS had paid $8,376.”
Sterling v. Mann, 608 P.2d 1038 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 7× “: This is an appeal from an order dismissing plaintiffs’ action to establish paternity and obtain child support filed pursuant to K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 39-755. Ta-Talinda was born October 27, 1974; however, this suit brought by her mother and the State of Kansas was not filed until…”
Florida, Dep't of HRS Ex Rel. Petit v. Breeden, 901 P.2d 1357 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “Second, a paternity action may be brought by the SRS “[w]hen authorized under K.S.A. 39-755 or 39-756.” K.S.A. 38-1115(b).”
State Ex Rel. Sec'y Srs v. Clear, 804 P.2d 961 (Kan. 1991). “While Barbara Clear had custody of the children from June 1978 until November 1986, the father paid only $50 of the court-ordered child support.”
In re H.R.B., 43 P.3d 887 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “39-709 and K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 39-755. While this result appears direcdy contrary to the established rule of law that a parent may not simply divest himself or herself of the duty to support his or her child, Kansas statutes are clear that such action is permitted as long as both…”
Michels v. Weingartner, 864 P.2d 1189 (Kan. 1993). ““In January of 1989, SRS filed a petition pursuant to K.S.A. 39-755 seeking reimbursement from Barbara Clear for the money paid to [the grandmother] in AFDC payments since 1986.”
State ex rel. Sec'y, Dep't of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Miller, 953 P.2d 245 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “39-718b, K.S.A. 39-755, and K.S.A. 39-756. Therefore, under K.”
State Ex Rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Stephens, 782 P.2d 68 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 3× “As authorized by K.S.A. 39-755, the action is prosecuted by the Secretary of Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS) pursuant to K.”
Grassi v. Grassi, 663 P.2d 312 (Kan. Ct. App. 1983). “39-755 was to provide a procedure, complementary with federal law, which would permit the State to obtain reimbursement for welfare assistance paid to children who have a right to support from some other person.” Here SRS had filed its assignment and served copies of the second…”
State ex rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Clear, 804 P.2d 961 (Kan. 1991). “In January of 1989, SRS filed a petition pursuant to K.S.A. 39-755 seeking reimbursement from Barbara Clear for the money paid to Burk in AFDC payments since 1986.”
Yoder v. Yoder, 721 P.2d 294 (Kan. Ct. App. 1986). “is legislatively authorized to commence an enforcement of support action on its own (K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 39-755), the language in K.”
State ex rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Kimbrel, 231 P.3d 576 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “filed by the [SRS] under K.S.A. 39-755 or 39-756.” In the present case, SRS brought this child support action against Kimbrel pursuant to these two statutory provisions.”
— K.S.A. § 39-755(a) — 5 cases
In re H.R.B., 43 P.3d 887 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “39-709 and K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 39-755. While this result appears direcdy contrary to the established rule of law that a parent may not simply divest himself or herself of the duty to support his or her child, Kansas statutes are clear that such action is permitted as long as both…”
Sterling v. Mann, 608 P.2d 1038 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). “: This is an appeal from an order dismissing plaintiffs’ action to establish paternity and obtain child support filed pursuant to K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 39-755. Ta-Talinda was born October 27, 1974; however, this suit brought by her mother and the State of Kansas was not filed until…”
State ex rel. Sec'y, Dep't of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Miller, 953 P.2d 245 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “39-718b, K.S.A. 39-755, and K.S.A. 39-756. Therefore, under K.”
State Ex Rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Stephens, 782 P.2d 68 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “As authorized by K.S.A. 39-755, the action is prosecuted by the Secretary of Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS) pursuant to K.”
In Re Hrb, 43 P.3d 887 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
— K.S.A. § 39-755(o) — 1 case
Sterling v. Mann, 608 P.2d 1038 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). “: This is an appeal from an order dismissing plaintiffs’ action to establish paternity and obtain child support filed pursuant to K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 39-755. Ta-Talinda was born October 27, 1974; however, this suit brought by her mother and the State of Kansas was not filed until…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.