Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 44-201 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
44-201.
History: R.S. 1923, 44-201; L. 1931, ch. 214, § 1; L. 1947, ch. 286, § 1; Repealed, L. 1987, ch. 186, § 1; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1960–1996 · leading case: Baker v. R. D. Andersen Constr. Co., 644 P.2d 1354 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982).
Baker v. R. D. Andersen Constr. Co., 644 P.2d 1354 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). “: This appeal was taken by plaintiffs Robert Baker and Roger DeHart (appellants) from an involuntary dismissal of their action filed pursuant to K.S.A. 44-201 et seq. By agreement dated May 2, 1978, between the appellee, R.”
R. D. Andersen Constr. Co. v. Kansas Dep't of Human Resources, 643 P.2d 1142 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). “(appellee), on a public works project, and what he contended was due to him as “the current rate of per diem wages” under K.S.A. 44-201, the eight-hour day on public work law.”
Fasse v. Lower Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., 736 P.2d 930 (Kan. 1987). “Chapter 44, Labor and Industries, and in particular the provisions of K.S.A. 44-201. The addendum, which included 44-201 in its entirety, concluded: “The 'current rate of per diem wages,’ for purposes of this project, shall be defined as and synonymous with the required wages…”
R. D. Andersen Constr. Co. v. City of Topeka, 612 P.2d 595 (Kan. 1980). “The primary issue is whether a city may specify, in its plans and specifications for a public building project, wage rates in excess of “the current rate of per diem wages” required by K.S.A. 44-201. The facts are brief. The City of Topeka decided to build a new structure to…”
Ritchie Paving, Inc. v. Kansas Dep't of Transp., 654 P.2d 440 (Kan. 1982). “: This is a declaratory judgment-injunction action originally brought by five construction firms claiming the defendant Kansas Department of Transportation violated K.S.A. 44-201 by specifying, on wholly state-funded highway projects, payment of federal Davis-Bacon prevailing…”
OMI Holdings, Inc. v. Howell, 918 P.2d 1274 (Kan. 1996). “the defendant and sought to, recover unpaid wages, alleging that the defendant violated the contract provision requiring compliance with 44-201.”
Noller v. GMC Truck & Coach Div., 772 P.2d 271 (Kan. 1989). “The facts showed that Washburn University owed the employees a duty to stipulate in the contract that adequate statutory wages would be paid to the contractor’s employees, pursuant to K.S.A. 44-201 and 44-202. Fasse does not stand for a change in third-party beneficiary law, as…”
R. D. Andersen Constr. Co. v. Weltmer, 577 P.2d 1197 (Kan. 1978). “With this procedural background, we turn now to the formal opinion: K.S.A. 44-201 provides: “ ‘The current rate of per diem wages’ for the intents and purposes of this act shall be the rate of wage paid in the locality as hereinafter [djefined to the greater number of workmen,…”
Topeka Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. Leahy, 353 P.2d 641 (Kan. 1960). “Faced with this situation, the commission for the revision of the statutes placed their own revised section in the statute book as section 44-201 and included the newly amended draft by the legislature as section 44-203.”
R. D. Andersen Constr. Co. v. Weltmer, 577 P.2d 1197 (Kan. 1978). “The specifications incorporated the provisions of K.S.A. 44-201 which require the contractor to pay its employees the “current rate of per diem wages,” as defined therein.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.