Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 44-510 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

44-510.

History: L. 1927, ch. 232, § 10; L. 1931, ch. 217, § 1; L. 1939, ch. 213, § 2; L. 1947, ch. 288, § 1; L. 1951, ch. 305, § 1; L. 1953, ch. 244, § 1; L. 1955, ch. 250, § 4; L. 1957, ch. 293, § 2; L. 1959, ch. 220, § 1; L. 1961, ch. 243, § 1; L. 1963, ch. 275, § 1; L. 1967, ch. 280, § 4; L. 1968, ch. 102, § 3; L. 1970, ch. 190, § 2; L. 1974, ch. 203, § 9; L. 1977, ch. 174, § 2; L. 1979, ch. 156, § 3; L. 1980, ch. 146, § 1; L. 1981, ch. 203, § 1; L. 1987, ch. 187, § 3; L. 1987, ch. 188, § 1; L. 1990, ch. 183, § 2; L. 1991, ch. 144, § 3; L. 1993, ch. 286, § 29; L. 1996, ch. 79, § 4; L. 1997, ch. 125, § 4; L. 1998, ch. 114, § 1; Repealed, L. 2000, ch. 160, § 25; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 87 cases, 1926–2019 · leading case: Murphy v. IBP, Inc., 727 P.2d 468 (Kan. 1986).
Murphy v. IBP, Inc., 727 P.2d 468 (Kan. 1986). · cites it 21× “IBP now contends Murphy has not established her right to unauthorized medical reimbursement pursuant to K.S.A. 44-510. That statute provides in pertinent part: “Except as otherwise provided in this act, medical compensation under the workmen’s compensation act shall be as…”
Houston v. Kansas High. Patrol, 708 P.2d 533 (Kan. 1985). · cites it 16× “To place the issue in perspective, K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 44-510 needs to be set forth as follows: "Medical compensation; powers of director.”
Castro v. IBP, Inc., 30 P.3d 1033 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 14× “The appellant argues that the Board improperly interpreted K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 44-510(c)(2). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court can review de novo.”
Casco v. Armour Swift-Eckrich, 154 P.3d 494 (Kan. 2007). · cites it 2× “44-510c(a)(2) (formerly K.S.A. 44-510[3][a]). 271 Kan. at 875 . However, the Pruter court then considered the language in K.”
Coleman v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 752 P.2d 645 (Kan. 1988). · cites it 2× “: Plaintiff, an employee covered by a collective bargaining agreement, claims that she was assessed infractions for absences incurred due to work-related injuries and while she was under the care of a physician provided by defendant pursuant to K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 44-510 of the…”
Woods v. Midwest Conveyor Co., 648 P.2d 234 (Kan. 1982). · cites it 2× “See K.S.A. 44-510, 44-510a, 44-510b, 44-510c, 44-510d, 44-510e, 44-510f, and 44-510g.”
Griffin v. Dale Willey Pontiac-Cadillac-GMC Truck, Inc., 991 P.2d 406 (Kan. 1999). · cites it 3× “K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 44-510 requires an employer to provide the services of a health-care provider and such medical, surgical, and hospital treatment as may be necessary to cure and relieve the employee from the effects of the injuiy.”
Matney v. Matney Chiropractic Clinic, 995 P.2d 871 (Kan. 2000). · cites it 6× “44-501(c) provides, in part: "Except for liability for medical compensation, as provided for in K.S.A. 44-510 and amendments thereto, the employer shall not be liable under the workers compensation act in respect of any injury which does not disable the employee for a period of…”
Redd v. Kansas Truck Ctr., 239 P.3d 66 (Kan. 2010). “Kansas Truck Center predicates much of its advocacy for a whole body impairment on the language in K.S.A. 44-510(d)(a)(23), which requires loss of a scheduled member be based upon the permanent impairment of function to the scheduled member “as determined” using the Guides.”
Lawrence v. Nat. Gas Pipe Line Co., 106 P.2d 685 (Kan. 1940). · cites it 16× “His death resulted from “other and independent causes” within the meaning of subparagraph 23 of section 44-510. After the death of Lawrence the appellants filed a claim with the workmen’s compensation commissioner asking for an award for 114 weeks at $14.”
Mitchell v. Petsmart, Inc., 239 P.3d 51 (Kan. 2010). · cites it 2× “; the case law interpreting those statutes; the Guides; and the legislative history for K.S.A. 44-510(d)(a)(23). We found the legislature created its own statutory mechanism to calculate permanent partial disability awards in K.”
Rinke v. Bank of Am., 148 P.3d 553 (Kan. 2006). · cites it 2× “Because the Court of Appeals’ ruling reversing the Board did not require the court to address the issue raised by appellants as to whether the Board erred as a matter of law in interpreting K.S.A. 44-510(a)(4) to allow an injured worker to recover more than $50,000, we remand to…”
— K.S.A. § 44-510(3)(a) — 3 cases
Casco v. Armour Swift-Eckrich, 154 P.3d 494 (Kan. 2007). “44-510c(a)(2) (formerly K.S.A. 44-510[3][a]). 271 Kan. at 875 . However, the Pruter court then considered the language in K.”
McIntosh v. Sedgwick Cnty., 147 P.3d 869 (Kan. 2006).
McIntosh v. Sedgwick Cnty., 123 P.3d 740 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(3)(c)(24) — 1 case
Schubert v. Peerless Prods., Inc., 573 P.2d 1009 (Kan. 1978).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(a) — 12 cases
Murphy v. IBP, Inc., 727 P.2d 468 (Kan. 1986). “IBP now contends Murphy has not established her right to unauthorized medical reimbursement pursuant to K.S.A. 44-510. That statute provides in pertinent part: “Except as otherwise provided in this act, medical compensation under the workmen’s compensation act shall be as…”
Houston v. Kansas High. Patrol, 708 P.2d 533 (Kan. 1985). “To place the issue in perspective, K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 44-510 needs to be set forth as follows: "Medical compensation; powers of director.”
Matney v. Matney Chiropractic Clinic, 995 P.2d 871 (Kan. 2000). “44-501(c) provides, in part: "Except for liability for medical compensation, as provided for in K.S.A. 44-510 and amendments thereto, the employer shall not be liable under the workers compensation act in respect of any injury which does not disable the employee for a period of…”
Graham v. Dokter Trucking Grp., 141 P.3d 1192 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006).
Hedrick v. U.S.D. No. 259, 935 P.2d 1083 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(a)(1) — 1 case
— K.S.A. § 44-510(a)(2) — 1 case
St. Francis Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield, 810 F. Supp. 1209 (D. Kan. 1992).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(a)(4) — 1 case
Rinke v. Bank of Am., 148 P.3d 553 (Kan. 2006). “Because the Court of Appeals’ ruling reversing the Board did not require the court to address the issue raised by appellants as to whether the Board erred as a matter of law in interpreting K.S.A. 44-510(a)(4) to allow an injured worker to recover more than $50,000, we remand to…”
— K.S.A. § 44-510(a)(6) — 1 case
Beisel v. Boeing Co., 932 P.2d 1050 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(a)(7) — 1 case
Beisel v. Boeing Co., 932 P.2d 1050 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(a)(8) — 1 case
Beisel v. Boeing Co., 932 P.2d 1050 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(b) — 3 cases
Houston v. Kansas High. Patrol, 708 P.2d 533 (Kan. 1985). “To place the issue in perspective, K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 44-510 needs to be set forth as follows: "Medical compensation; powers of director.”
Murphy v. IBP, Inc., 727 P.2d 468 (Kan. 1986). “IBP now contends Murphy has not established her right to unauthorized medical reimbursement pursuant to K.S.A. 44-510. That statute provides in pertinent part: “Except as otherwise provided in this act, medical compensation under the workmen’s compensation act shall be as…”
Lawrence v. Cobler, 915 P.2d 157 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(b)(l) — 1 case
Gamblian v. City of Parsons, 931 P.2d 1238 (Kan. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(c) — 6 cases
Murphy v. IBP, Inc., 727 P.2d 468 (Kan. 1986). “IBP now contends Murphy has not established her right to unauthorized medical reimbursement pursuant to K.S.A. 44-510. That statute provides in pertinent part: “Except as otherwise provided in this act, medical compensation under the workmen’s compensation act shall be as…”
Houston v. Kansas High. Patrol, 708 P.2d 533 (Kan. 1985). “To place the issue in perspective, K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 44-510 needs to be set forth as follows: "Medical compensation; powers of director.”
Griffin v. Dale Willey Pontiac-Cadillac-GMC Truck, Inc., 991 P.2d 406 (Kan. 1999). “K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 44-510 requires an employer to provide the services of a health-care provider and such medical, surgical, and hospital treatment as may be necessary to cure and relieve the employee from the effects of the injuiy.”
Wietharn v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 820 P.2d 719 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991).
Ward v. Allen Cnty. Hosp., 324 P.3d 1122 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(c)(1) — 1 case
Bryant v. U.S.D. No. 259, 992 P.2d 808 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(c)(2) — 1 case
Castro v. IBP, Inc., 30 P.3d 1033 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “The appellant argues that the Board improperly interpreted K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 44-510(c)(2). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court can review de novo.”
— K.S.A. § 44-510(c)(l) — 1 case
Bryant v. U.S.D. No. 259, 992 P.2d 808 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(d)(1) — 1 case
— K.S.A. § 44-510(d)(a)(23) — 2 cases
Redd v. Kansas Truck Ctr., 239 P.3d 66 (Kan. 2010). “Kansas Truck Center predicates much of its advocacy for a whole body impairment on the language in K.S.A. 44-510(d)(a)(23), which requires loss of a scheduled member be based upon the permanent impairment of function to the scheduled member “as determined” using the Guides.”
Mitchell v. Petsmart, Inc., 239 P.3d 51 (Kan. 2010). “; the case law interpreting those statutes; the Guides; and the legislative history for K.S.A. 44-510(d)(a)(23). We found the legislature created its own statutory mechanism to calculate permanent partial disability awards in K.”
— K.S.A. § 44-510(d)(a)(l) — 1 case
Mitchell v. Petsmart, Inc., 239 P.3d 51 (Kan. 2010). “; the case law interpreting those statutes; the Guides; and the legislative history for K.S.A. 44-510(d)(a)(23). We found the legislature created its own statutory mechanism to calculate permanent partial disability awards in K.”
— K.S.A. § 44-510(e) — 1 case
Sims v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 933 P.2d 161 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 44-510(h) — 4 cases
Robinson v. Sw. Bell Tel., Co., 180 P.3d 597 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
Lleras v. Via Christi Reg'l Med. Ctr., 154 P.3d 1130 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
Morgan v. Inter-Collegiate Press & Home Ins., 606 P.2d 479 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980).
Lleras v. Via Christi Reg'l Med. Ctr., 154 P.3d 1130 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.