K.S.A. » Chapter 05
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 5-405 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

5-405.

History: L. 1973, ch. 24, § 5; Repealed, L. 2018, ch. 90, § 35; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1981–2017 · leading case: Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners Ex Rel. Bd. of Trs. v. Cent. Air Conditioning Co., 683 P.2d 1282 (Kan. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners Ex Rel. Bd. of Trs. v. Cent. Air Conditioning Co., 683 P.2d 1282 (Kan. 1984). · cites it 4× “” K.S.A. 5-405, a part of the Kansas Uniform Arbitration Act, reads in part as follows: “(c) The hearing shall be conducted by all the arbitrators but a majority may determine any question and render a final award.”
Moreland v. Perkins, Smart & Boyd, 240 P.3d 601 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “appointed as a neutral or corruption in any of the arbitrators or misconduct prejudicing the rights of any party; "(3) The arbitrators exceeded their powers; "(4) The arbitrators refused to postpone the hearing upon sufficient cause being shown therefor or refused to hear…”
Heartland Surgical Specialty Hosp., LLC v. Reed, 287 P.3d 933 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 5× “r appointed as a neutral or corruption in any of the arbitrators or misconduct prejudicing the rights of any party; (3) The arbitrators exceeded their powers; (4) The arbitrators refused to postpone the hearing upon sufficient cause being shown therefore or refused to hear…”
Rural Water Dist. No. 6 v. Ziegler Corp., 677 P.2d 573 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). “appointed as a neutral or corruption in any of the arbitrators or misconduct prejudicing the rights of any party; “(3) The arbitrators exceeded their powers; “(4) The arbitrators refused to postpone the hearing upon sufficient cause being shown therefor or refused to hear…”
Evans Elec. Constr. Co. v. Univ. of Kansas Med. Ctr., 634 P.2d 1079 (Kan. 1981). “appointed as a neutral or corruption in any of the arbitrators or misconduct prejudicing the rights of any party; “(3) The arbitrators exceeded their powers; “(4) The arbitrators refused to postpone the hearing upon sufficient cause being shown therefor or refused to hear…”
Foley Co. v. Grindsted Prods., Inc., 662 P.2d 1254 (Kan. 1983). “appointed as a neutral or corruption in any of the arbitrators or misconduct prejudicing the rights of any party; “(3) The arbitrators exceeded their powers; “(4) The arbitrators refused to postpone the hearing upon sufficient cause being shown therefor or refused to hear…”
Neighbors Constr. Co. v. Woodland Park at Soldier Creek, LLC, 284 P.3d 1057 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). “appointed as a neutral or corruption in any of the arbitrators or misconduct prejudicing the rights of any party; “(3) The arbitrators exceeded their powers; “(4) The arbitrators refused to postpone the hearing upon sufficient cause being shown therefor or refused to hear…”
Wasinger v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Salina (Kan. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3× “See K.S.A. 5-405 (setting out how an arbitration hearing occurs).”
— K.S.A. § 5-405(a) — 1 case
Wasinger v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Salina (Kan. Ct. App. 2017). “See K.S.A. 5-405 (setting out how an arbitration hearing occurs).”
— K.S.A. § 5-405(b) — 1 case
Wasinger v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Salina (Kan. Ct. App. 2017). “See K.S.A. 5-405 (setting out how an arbitration hearing occurs).”
— K.S.A. § 5-405(c) — 1 case
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners Ex Rel. Bd. of Trs. v. Cent. Air Conditioning Co., 683 P.2d 1282 (Kan. 1984). “” K.S.A. 5-405, a part of the Kansas Uniform Arbitration Act, reads in part as follows: “(c) The hearing shall be conducted by all the arbitrators but a majority may determine any question and render a final award.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.