K.S.A. » Chapter 05
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 5-409 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

5-409.

History: L. 1973, ch. 24, § 9; Repealed, L. 2018, ch. 90, § 35; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Party may, by its actions, waive right to object to award made after period provided for. U.S.D. No. 215 v. L. R. Foy Constr. Co., 237 Kan. 1, 4, 697 P.2d 456 (1985).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1985–2000 · leading case: Alexander v. Everhart, 7 P.3d 1282 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alexander v. Everhart, 7 P.3d 1282 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “Everhart first argues the trial court erred by not finding that Alexander waived his claim that Everhart had breached or repudiated the contract or ratified the arbitrator’s ruling when Alexander sought modification of the arbitration award.”
Bd. of Educ. v. L. R. Foy Constr. Co., 697 P.2d 456 (Kan. 1985). “The application to the arbitrators for clarification, made pursuant to K.S.A. 5-409, was acknowledgment of the validity of the award.”
Heineman v. Charno, 877 S.W.2d 224 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). “2d 456, 458 (1985) (application for clarification of an arbitration award can be made “pursuant to K.S.A. 5-409,” which is also identical to Missouri § 435.”
Alexander v. Everhart, 3 P.3d 575 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “Everhart first argues the trial court erred by not finding that Alexander waived his claim that Everhart had breached or repudiated the contract or ratified the arbitrator’s ruling when Alexander sought modification of the arbitration award.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.