K.S.A. » Chapter 05
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 5-418 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

5-418.

History: L. 1973, ch. 24, § 18; Repealed, L. 2018, ch. 90, § 35; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2022 · leading case: Max Rieke & Bros. v. Van Deurzen & Assocs., P.A., 118 P.3d 704 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Max Rieke & Bros. v. Van Deurzen & Assocs., P.A., 118 P.3d 704 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 17× “Nevertheless, before reaching the merits of Rieke’s argument, we must consider Van Deurzen’s contention that this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.”
Kansas Gas & Elec. Co. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 751 P.2d 146 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 10× “According to the Prefatory Note to the uniform act, “The section on Appeals is intended to remove doubts as to what orders are appealable and to limit appeals prior to judgment to those instances where the element of finality is present.”
East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. v. Werline, 307 S.W.3d 267 (Tex. 2010). “17; Kan. Stat. Ann. § 5-418 ; Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann.”
Moreland v. Perkins, Smart & Boyd, 240 P.3d 601 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “The court later denied PSB's motion to alter or amend. PSB appeals. The Kansas Uniform Arbitration Act (Act), K.”
Nat'l Educ. Ass'n v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 501, 925 P.2d 835 (Kan. 1996). · cites it 3× “The drafters of the uniform act considered certain orders sufficiently final to merit appeal. According to the Prefatory Note to the uniform act, ‘The section on Appeals is intended to remove doubts as to what orders are appealable and to limit appeals prior to judgment to those…”
Rural Water Dist. No. 6 v. Ziegler Corp., 677 P.2d 573 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “An appeal from an order confirming an arbitration award is permitted by K.S.A. 5-418(a)(3), and K.S.A. 5-418(fe) provides that “[t]he appeal shall be taken in the manner and to the same extent as from orders or judgments in a civil action.”
City of Wamego v. L. R. Foy Constr. Co., 675 P.2d 912 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “All further action on plaintiff s petition was stayed pursuant to K.SA. 5-418 until decision of this appeal.”
Hodes v. Comprehensive Health Assocs., P.A., 670 P.2d 76 (Kan. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “*38 K.S.A. 5-418(a)(l) and (2) set forth the statutory right to immediate appeal from orders on applications made under K.”
Baxter v. John Weitzel, Inc., 871 P.2d 855 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 3× “Weitzel filed its appeal pursuant to K.S.A. 5-418, which provides: “(a) An appeal may be taken from: (1) An order denying an application to compel arbitration made under K.”
Alexander v. Everhart, 7 P.3d 1282 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “*900 Everhart appeals the court’s decision to vacate the arbitration award pursuant to K.S.A. 5-418(a)(3). They contend the court erroneously found they breached or repudiated the contract and voided the arbitration provision.”
Neighbors Constr. Co. v. Woodland Park at Soldier Creek, LLC, 284 P.3d 1057 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). “On the other hand, Neighbors Construction argues that Woodland Park has intermixed statutory and nonsta- *43 tutoiy grounds for relief in its brief, which makes it difficult to comprehend Woodland Park’s precise argument on appeal. The Kansas Uniform Arbitration Act, which is…”
Heartland Surgical Specialty Hosp., LLC v. Reed, 287 P.3d 933 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). “Specifically, it maintains that the arbitration must be vacated because both K.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 5-418(a) — 3 cases
Moreland v. Perkins, Smart & Boyd, 240 P.3d 601 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “The court later denied PSB's motion to alter or amend. PSB appeals. The Kansas Uniform Arbitration Act (Act), K.”
Neighbors Constr. Co. v. Woodland Park at Soldier Creek, LLC, 284 P.3d 1057 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). “On the other hand, Neighbors Construction argues that Woodland Park has intermixed statutory and nonsta- *43 tutoiy grounds for relief in its brief, which makes it difficult to comprehend Woodland Park’s precise argument on appeal. The Kansas Uniform Arbitration Act, which is…”
Heartland Surgical Specialty Hosp., LLC v. Reed, 287 P.3d 933 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). “Specifically, it maintains that the arbitration must be vacated because both K.”
— K.S.A. § 5-418(a)(1) — 3 cases
Max Rieke & Bros. v. Van Deurzen & Assocs., P.A., 118 P.3d 704 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “Nevertheless, before reaching the merits of Rieke’s argument, we must consider Van Deurzen’s contention that this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.”
Kansas Gas & Elec. Co. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 751 P.2d 146 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). “According to the Prefatory Note to the uniform act, “The section on Appeals is intended to remove doubts as to what orders are appealable and to limit appeals prior to judgment to those instances where the element of finality is present.”
Baxter v. John Weitzel, Inc., 871 P.2d 855 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994). “Weitzel filed its appeal pursuant to K.S.A. 5-418, which provides: “(a) An appeal may be taken from: (1) An order denying an application to compel arbitration made under K.”
— K.S.A. § 5-418(a)(3) — 4 cases
Rural Water Dist. No. 6 v. Ziegler Corp., 677 P.2d 573 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). “An appeal from an order confirming an arbitration award is permitted by K.S.A. 5-418(a)(3), and K.S.A. 5-418(fe) provides that “[t]he appeal shall be taken in the manner and to the same extent as from orders or judgments in a civil action.”
Alexander v. Everhart, 7 P.3d 1282 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “*900 Everhart appeals the court’s decision to vacate the arbitration award pursuant to K.S.A. 5-418(a)(3). They contend the court erroneously found they breached or repudiated the contract and voided the arbitration provision.”
In re Borich, 514 P.3d 352 (Kan. 2022).
Alexander v. Everhart, 3 P.3d 575 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
— K.S.A. § 5-418(a)(5) — 1 case
Max Rieke & Bros. v. Van Deurzen & Assocs., P.A., 118 P.3d 704 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “Nevertheless, before reaching the merits of Rieke’s argument, we must consider Van Deurzen’s contention that this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.”
— K.S.A. § 5-418(a)(l) — 4 cases
Kansas Gas & Elec. Co. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 751 P.2d 146 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). “According to the Prefatory Note to the uniform act, “The section on Appeals is intended to remove doubts as to what orders are appealable and to limit appeals prior to judgment to those instances where the element of finality is present.”
Max Rieke & Bros. v. Van Deurzen & Assocs., P.A., 118 P.3d 704 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “Nevertheless, before reaching the merits of Rieke’s argument, we must consider Van Deurzen’s contention that this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.”
City of Wamego v. L. R. Foy Constr. Co., 675 P.2d 912 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). “All further action on plaintiff s petition was stayed pursuant to K.SA. 5-418 until decision of this appeal.”
Hodes v. Comprehensive Health Assocs., P.A., 670 P.2d 76 (Kan. Ct. App. 1983). “*38 K.S.A. 5-418(a)(l) and (2) set forth the statutory right to immediate appeal from orders on applications made under K.”
— K.S.A. § 5-418(b) — 3 cases
Moreland v. Perkins, Smart & Boyd, 240 P.3d 601 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “The court later denied PSB's motion to alter or amend. PSB appeals. The Kansas Uniform Arbitration Act (Act), K.”
Kansas Gas & Elec. Co. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 751 P.2d 146 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). “According to the Prefatory Note to the uniform act, “The section on Appeals is intended to remove doubts as to what orders are appealable and to limit appeals prior to judgment to those instances where the element of finality is present.”
Baxter v. John Weitzel, Inc., 871 P.2d 855 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994). “Weitzel filed its appeal pursuant to K.S.A. 5-418, which provides: “(a) An appeal may be taken from: (1) An order denying an application to compel arbitration made under K.”
— K.S.A. § 5-418(c)(l) — 1 case
Hodes v. Comprehensive Health Assocs., P.A., 670 P.2d 76 (Kan. Ct. App. 1983). “*38 K.S.A. 5-418(a)(l) and (2) set forth the statutory right to immediate appeal from orders on applications made under K.”
— K.S.A. § 5-418(fe) — 1 case
Rural Water Dist. No. 6 v. Ziegler Corp., 677 P.2d 573 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). “An appeal from an order confirming an arbitration award is permitted by K.S.A. 5-418(a)(3), and K.S.A. 5-418(fe) provides that “[t]he appeal shall be taken in the manner and to the same extent as from orders or judgments in a civil action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.