History:
L. 1984, ch. 201, § 2; Repealed, L. 2021, ch. 64, § 43; January 1, 2022.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Whether court erred in dismissing compliant against defendant for improper verification of warrant examined. State v. Green, 257 Kan. 444, 448, 901 P.2d 1350 (1995).
2. Consent to adoption not properly notarized/acknowledged; substantial compliance found with requirements of consent statute. In re Adoption of X.J.A., 284 Kan. 853, 166 P.3d 396 (2007).
In Re the Adoption of X.J.A., 166 P.3d 396 (Kan. 2007). · cites it 4ד) K.S.A. 53-503(a). "Satisfactory evidence" is defined as follows: "A notarial officer has satisfactory evidence that a person is the person whose true signature is on a document if that person is (1) personally known to the notarial officer, (2) identified upon the oath or…”
In re Rumsey, 343 P.3d 93 (Kan. 2015). “The notarizing of the Affidavit was in violation of K.S.A. 53-503. The hearing panel therefore concludes that the Respondent violated KRPC 8.”
State v. Green, 901 P.2d 1350 (Kan. 1995). “K.S.A. 53-503(b) states: “In taking a verification upon oath or affirmation, the notarial officer must determine, either from personal knowledge or from satisfactory evidence, that the person appearing before the officer and making the verification is the person whose true…”
In re the Adoption of X.J.A., 142 P.3d 327 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 3ד“By executing a certificate of a notarial act, the notarial officer certifies that the *626 officer has made the determinations required by K.S.A. 53-503.” K.S.A. 53-508(c). Appellees do not dispute that Mother did not personally appear before or make the statutory declaration…”
State ex rel. Sec'y of DCF v. Smith (Kan. 2017). “" See K.S.A. 53-503 (notarial acts); K.S.A. 53- 504 (listing who may perform notarial acts).”
In re Kraushaar, 997 P.2d 81 (Kan. 2000). · cites it 2דKraushaar explains in his brief that he intended to direct the panel’s attention to K.S.A. 53-503(f) which says: “A notarial officer has satisfactory evidence that person is the person whose true signature is on a document if that person is (1) personally known to the notarial…”
— K.S.A. § 53-503(a) — 2 cases
In Re the Adoption of X.J.A., 166 P.3d 396 (Kan. 2007). “) K.S.A. 53-503(a). "Satisfactory evidence" is defined as follows: "A notarial officer has satisfactory evidence that a person is the person whose true signature is on a document if that person is (1) personally known to the notarial officer, (2) identified upon the oath or…”
In re the Adoption of X.J.A., 142 P.3d 327 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). ““By executing a certificate of a notarial act, the notarial officer certifies that the *626 officer has made the determinations required by K.S.A. 53-503.” K.S.A. 53-508(c). Appellees do not dispute that Mother did not personally appear before or make the statutory declaration…”
— K.S.A. § 53-503(b) — 2 cases
State v. Green, 901 P.2d 1350 (Kan. 1995). “K.S.A. 53-503(b) states: “In taking a verification upon oath or affirmation, the notarial officer must determine, either from personal knowledge or from satisfactory evidence, that the person appearing before the officer and making the verification is the person whose true…”
In Re the Adoption of X.J.A., 166 P.3d 396 (Kan. 2007). “) K.S.A. 53-503(a). "Satisfactory evidence" is defined as follows: "A notarial officer has satisfactory evidence that a person is the person whose true signature is on a document if that person is (1) personally known to the notarial officer, (2) identified upon the oath or…”
In re Kraushaar, 997 P.2d 81 (Kan. 2000). “Kraushaar explains in his brief that he intended to direct the panel’s attention to K.S.A. 53-503(f) which says: “A notarial officer has satisfactory evidence that person is the person whose true signature is on a document if that person is (1) personally known to the notarial…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.