Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 55-101 (2026)

Natural gas for residents of platted land outside city; laying and maintenance of pipes

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

55-101. Natural gas for residents of platted land outside city; laying and maintenance of pipes. Whenever any tract of land not in an incorporated city shall be laid out in lots or other subdivisions as now required by law, the owner of such lands or his or her assigns is authorized to lay, maintain and operate natural-gas pipes along and across the streets and other grounds dedicated by such owner to public use for the purpose of furnishing natural gas for light and fuel to the residents of said land, and for such purpose is authorized to lay, maintain and operate natural-gas pipes across any public highway: Provided, That the said pipes shall be laid under the surface of said streets, public grounds, and highways, and that said streets, grounds and highways shall be restored so as not to impair their usefulness: And provided further, That nothing herein shall be construed as granting to such owner or his or her assigns the exclusive right to furnish said residents with natural gas for light and fuel.

History: L. 1899, ch. 143, § 1; February 22; R.S. 1923, 55-101.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Care required in laying pipe along public highway. Murphy v. Gas & Oil Co., 96 Kan. 321, 329, 150 P. 581.


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: Robert-Gay Energy Enter., Inc. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 685 P.2d 299 (Kan. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Robert-Gay Energy Enter., Inc. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 685 P.2d 299 (Kan. 1984). “55-603: “The state corporation commission is authorized and it shall be its duty, to so regulate the taking of crude oil from any pool within the state of Kansas as to prevent waste therein or, independently of waste, to prevent the inequitable or unfair taking of crude oil…”
Beazley Ins. Co., Inc. v. Foster Poultry Farms (E.D. Cal. 2024). “; Kansas Restraint of Trade Act, Kan. Stat. Ann. § 55-101 , et seq.; Maine’s Antitrust Statute, Me.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.