K.S.A. » Chapter 56
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 56-336 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

56-336.

History: L. 1972, ch. 210, § 36; L. 1994, ch. 140, § 10; Repealed, L. 1998, ch. 93, § 76; July 1, 1999.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Applied; both parties liable for obligations until partnership affairs wound up. Mildfelt v. Lair, 221 Kan. 557, 569, 561 P.2d 805.

2. Cited; former partner not liable for barred partnership debt acknowledged by another; laches. Daniels Trucking, Inc. v. Rogers, 7 Kan. App. 2d 407, 408, 409, 411, 643 P.2d 1108 (1982).

3. Withdrawing partner's continuing liability for partnership debts, effect of agreement discharging liability, dissolution of partnership examined. Belt v. Shepard, 15 Kan. App. 2d 448, 450, 808 P.2d 907 (1991).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1982–1991 · leading case: Belt v. Shepard, 808 P.2d 907 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Belt v. Shepard, 808 P.2d 907 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 3× “The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in construing K.S.A. 56-336 and in applying the statute to the facts of this case.”
Daniels Trucking, Inc. v. Rogers, 643 P.2d 1108 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). “56-315, even after dissolution of the partnership, K.S.A. 56-336(o), K.S.A. 60-520(¿) is in point: “If there be two or more joint contractors, no one of whom is entitled to act as the agent of the others, no such joint contractor shall lose the benefit of the statute of…”
— K.S.A. § 56-336(b) — 1 case
Belt v. Shepard, 808 P.2d 907 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in construing K.S.A. 56-336 and in applying the statute to the facts of this case.”
— K.S.A. § 56-336(o) — 1 case
Daniels Trucking, Inc. v. Rogers, 643 P.2d 1108 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). “56-315, even after dissolution of the partnership, K.S.A. 56-336(o), K.S.A. 60-520(¿) is in point: “If there be two or more joint contractors, no one of whom is entitled to act as the agent of the others, no such joint contractor shall lose the benefit of the statute of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.