K.S.A. » Chapter 58
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 58-2406 (2026)

Conveyance to one person when consideration paid by another

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

58-2406. Conveyance to one person when consideration paid by another. When a conveyance for a valuable consideration is made to one person and the consideration therefor paid by another, no use or trust shall result in favor of the latter; but the title shall vest in the former, subject to the provisions of the next two sections.

History: G.S. 1868, ch. 114, § 6; October 31; R.S. 1923, 67-406.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1978–2010 · leading case: Morris v. Kasparek (In Re Kasparek), 426 B.R. 332 (10th Cir. BAP 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Morris v. Kasparek (In Re Kasparek), 426 B.R. 332 (10th Cir. BAP 2010). “Kan. Stat. Ann. § 58-2406 . 26 . R. Chester, G.”
In Re the Est. of Sauder, 156 P.3d 1204 (Kan. 2007). “K.S.A. 58-2406 prevents a landlord from terminating the lease and reaping the harvest after the tenant has incurred the expense but has not been compensated.”
United States v. Krause (In Re Krause), 386 B.R. 785 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2008). · cites it 2× “176 The Court notes that this statute first appeared in the General Statutes of 1868 as an “exception” to what is now Kan. Stat. Ann. § 58-2406 (2005) which provides that when a conveyance for valid consideration is made to a party and the consideration is paid by another, no…”
Univ. State Bank v. Blevins, 605 P.2d 91 (Kan. 1980). “” K.S.A. 58-2406. The second following section, K.”
Stauth v. Stauth, 582 P.2d 1160 (Kan. Ct. App. 1978). “K.S.A. 58-2406 provides that, subject to the provisions of K.”
Vess Oil Corp. v. SemCrude, L.P. (In re SemCrude, L.P.), 418 B.R. 98 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009). “See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 58-2406 . To find the Kansas common law rule that governs the instant dispute, the Court must look to the following language, which was quoted favorably by the Kansas Supreme Court in 1944: [t]he doctrine of resulting trusts is founded upon the presumed…”
In Re Semcrude, Lp, 418 B.R. 98 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009). “To find the Kansas common law rule that governs the instant dispute, the Court must look to the following language, which was quoted favorably by the Kansas Supreme Court in 1944: [t]he doctrine of resulting trusts is founded upon the presumed intention of the parties; and, as a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.