History:
G.S. 1868, ch. 114, § 17; R.S. 1923, 67-417; Repealed, L. 2002, ch. 133, § 93; January 1, 2003.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Inter vivos revocable trust held contract testamentary in nature; will substitute; law governing; claim against estate enforceable. Reznik v. McKee, Trustee, 216 Kan. 659, 679, 534 P.2d 243.
2. Cited; general rules on revocation of private express trusts, revocation of power of attorney discussed. Peterson v. Peterson, 10 Kan. App. 2d 437, 439, 700 P.2d 585 (1985).
Godley v. Valley View State Bank, 89 P.3d 595 (Kan. 2004). “As a result, a majority of the new beneficiaries can appoint the new trustee, Valley View, upon Merrill Lynch’s resignation or refusal to serve as trustee.”
Peterson v. Peterson, 700 P.2d 585 (Kan. Ct. App. 1985). “In this case, there is no dispute that the trust instruments reserved no power of revocation and by their clear'and unambiguous terms were irrevocable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.