58-3501.
Purpose of act.
The purpose of this act is to authorize compliance with the provisions of the federal uniform relocation assistance and real property acquisition policies act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646, 42 U.S.C.A. 4601 et seq.), and amendments thereto, and as used in this act, the term "federal act" means such act and amendments thereto.
History:
L. 1973, ch. 228, § 1; L. 1989, ch. 168, § 1; April 13.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Appeals under K.S.A. 58-3509, court makes independent finding of facts and conclusions of law based on record below. Frick v. City of Salina, 289 Kan. 1, 208 P.3d 739 (2009).
2. Agreement for federal funds gives Kansas courts authority to award attorney fees and costs in condemnation actions. Estate of Kirkpatrick v. City of Olathe, 289 Kan. 554, 215 P.3d 561 (2009).
Ben J. v. City of Salina, 208 P.3d 739 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 8ד: This appeal requires us to determine the standard of review to be applied by a district court when considering an appeal from a determination of relocation benefits under the Kansas Relocation Assistance for Persons Displaced by Acquisition of Real Property Act, K.S.A. 58-3501…”
Est. of Kirkpatrick v. City of Olathe, 215 P.3d 561 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 2ד” In 1973, the Kansas Legislature adopted the Relocation Assistance for Persons Displaced by Acquisition of Real Property Act (Kansas Act), K.S.A. 58-3501 et seq., for the specified purpose of “authorizing] compliance with” the Federal Act.”
Bonanza, Inc. v. Carlson, 9 P.3d 541 (Kan. 2000). · cites it 4דSee K.S.A. 58-3501. The Federal Act prohibits a federal agency from approving any federally funded or assisted project in which a political subdivision of a state acquires real property without receiving assurances of the state that the acquiring political subdivision will (1)…”
Beaty v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 186 Cal. App. 3d 897 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2דCode § 11-80-2 ; Kan. Stat. Ann. § 58-3501 ; Md. Transp. Code Ann.”
Ben J. v. City of Salina, 235 P.3d 1211 (Kan. 2010). “3d 739 (2009) (Frick I), the Fricks appealed the calculation of relocation benefits awarded under the Kansas Relocation Assistance for Persons Displaced by Acquisition of Real Property Act, K.S.A. 58-3501 et seq., after the City acquired, through the power of eminent domain, see…”
Stockman v. Unified Gov't of Wyandotte Cnty./Kansas City, 6 P.3d 900 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2דSimilarly, the trial court found that the Kansas Relocation Assistance for Persons Displaced by Acquisitions of Real Property Act, K.S.A. 58-3501 et seq., did not apply. It found that the UG’s relocation plan complied with K.”
In Re Condemnation of Land for State High. Purposes, 683 P.2d 1247 (Kan. 1984). “and the provisions of K.S.A. 58-3501 et seq., and until the Condemnor demonstrates the taking of this landowner’s property is reasonable and necessary.”
Kansas Fire & Saf. Equip. v. City of Topeka (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 3דThird-party displaced persons can pursue relocation benefits under the Kansas Relocation Act, K.S.A. 58-3501 et seq., or through another cause of action outside the EDPA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.