K.S.A. » Chapter 59
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 59-101 (2026)

Citation of act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

59-101. Citation of act. This act is named and may be cited as the Kansas probate code.

History: L. 1939, ch. 180, § 1; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2005–2020 · leading case: Martin v. Naik, 300 P.3d 625 (Kan. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Martin v. Naik, 300 P.3d 625 (Kan. 2013). “But that is not the case, as evidenced by the plethora of provisions contained in the Kansas Probate Code, K.S.A. 59-101 et seq., where actions are commenced by a petition.”
In Re the Est. of Pritchard, 154 P.3d 24 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “” To the extent that we are required to look to the provisions of the Kansas Probate Code, K.S.A. 59-101 et seq., the scope and range of permissible orders in probate proceedings involves issues of law over which an appellate court has unlimited review.”
Reese v. Muret, 150 P.3d 309 (Kan. 2007). “Probate action Because this action arises out of the administration of a decedent’s estate, we will begin our analysis with the probate code, *5 K.S.A. 59-101 et seq. K.S.A. 59-501 defines children for purposes of intestate succession, stating: “ ‘Children’ means biological…”
In re the Est. of Wolf, 112 P.3d 94 (Kan. 2005). “2d 190 (1957), to support its argument that attaching the Option Agreement containing the attorney fees provision satisfied its pleading obligations under the Kansas Probate Code, K.S.A. 59-101 et seq. In Estate of Moe, the claimant filed a petition against the estate to recover…”
Rodriquez-Tocker v. Est. of Tocker, 129 P.3d 586 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “, and the Kansas Probate Code, K.S.A. 59-101 et seq. The court further found I .”
In re Est. of Moore (Kan. 2019). “See K.S.A. 59-101 ("This act is named and may be cited as the Kansas probate code.”
In re Est. of Boone (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). “Finally, they argue that the district court had full discretion to determine whether to award a spousal allowance and a reasonable person could agree with the district court's decision not to do so.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.