History:
L. 1965, ch. 348, § 17; L. 1976, ch. 243, § 19; L. 1976, ch. 242, § 77; L. 1978, ch. 223, § 8; L. 1981, ch. 230, § 1; L. 1986, ch. 211, § 14; L. 1990, ch. 92, § 26; Repealed, L. 1996, ch. 167, § 65; April 18.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Considered; constitutionality of "Sex Offenders Act" (K.S.A. 62-1534 et seq.), upheld. State v. Englishan, 198 Kan. 196, 208, 424 P.2d 601.
2. In reviewing an involuntary commitment proceeding, there must be a reasonable inference the patient is mentally impaired and is presently dangerous to himself, herself or others. In re Gatson, 3 Kan. App. 2d 265, 268, 593 P.2d 423.
Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979). “1978); Kan. Stat. Ann. §59-2917 (1976); Mont. Rev.”
Ortega v. IBP, Inc., 874 P.2d 1188 (Kan. 1994). “59-3013; for mental illness commitments, K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 59-2917; in attorney discipline proceedings, Supreme Court Rule 211(f) (1993 Kan.”
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Smith, 747 P.2d 816 (Kan. 1987). “21-4603; (8) appeals from felony convictions or habeas corpus findings to the appellate courts of Kansas; “ (9) appeals from an order of the court waiving jurisdiction of a juvenile offender to the criminal courts; “(10) habeas corpus cases arising out of an involuntary…”
Boulanger v. Pol, 900 P.2d 823 (Kan. 1995). “” K.S.A. 59-2917(f). An involuntary patient shall be discharged when “no longer in need of treatment in the facility.”
In Re Kossow, 393 A.2d 97 (D.C. 1978). “1977); and Kan.Stat.Ann. § 59-2917 (1975). 8 .As indicated in the text, D.”
Mahomes-Vinson v. United States, 751 F. Supp. 913 (D. Kan. 1990). “” See K.S.A. 59-2917 (court shall order treatment for persons found to be mentally ill).”
In Re the Treatment of Gatson, 593 P.2d 423 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). “K.S.A. 59-2917 provides in part: “Upon the completion of the hearing, if the court or jury finds that the proposed patient is beyond a reasonable doubt a mentally ill person, and after a careful consideration of reasonable alternatives to inpatient treatment the court shall…”
Hokansen v. United States, 868 F.2d 372 (10th Cir. 1989). “I am unable to agree that those general principles allowing recovery for negligent release are confined, as the majority opinion concludes, to cases where there is involuntary commitment of a patient pursuant to K.S.A. 59-2917 (Supp. 1987). It is true that the Durflinger opinion…”
Hokansen v. United States, 868 F.2d 372 (10th Cir. 1989). “I am unable to agree that those general principles allowing recovery for negligent release are confined, as the majority opinion concludes, to cases where there is involuntary commitment of a patient pursuant to K.S.A. 59-2917 (Supp.1987). It is true that the Durflinger opinion…”
— K.S.A. § 59-2917(f) — 1 case
Boulanger v. Pol, 900 P.2d 823 (Kan. 1995). “” K.S.A. 59-2917(f). An involuntary patient shall be discharged when “no longer in need of treatment in the facility.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.