Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 59-301 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
59-301.
History: L. 1939, ch. 180, § 17; L. 1965, ch. 346, § 8; L. 1976, ch. 243, § 42; Repealed, L. 1976, ch. 242, § 99; January 10, 1977.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1942–2023 · leading case: In Re Petition of City of Moran, 713 P.2d 451 (Kan. 1986).
In Re Petition of City of Moran, 713 P.2d 451 (Kan. 1986). “With the repeal of K.S.A. 59-301 (Corrick) in 1976, there is no longer any statutory authority for such a proceeding.”
Starke v. Starke, 125 P.2d 738 (Kan. 1942). “) The new code specifically provided in paragraph (12), section 59-301, that probate courts “shall have and exercise such equitable powers as may be necessary and proper fully to hear and determine any matter properly before such courts.”
In Re Est. of Graves, 457 P.2d 71 (Kan. 1969). “In this case the trial court has equity powers to require compliance with the terms of the will in accordance with the intention of the testatrix, and the court is obligated to enforce compliance with 59-1405, supra, where the property of the decedent is liable for her debts and…”
Babb v. Stewart, 190 P.2d 872 (Kan. 1948). “) Section 59-301, in which are set forth the instances wherein probate courts shall have original jurisdiction, provides in paragraph (12): “And they shall have and exercise such equitable powers as may be necessary and proper fully to hear and determine any matter properly…”
Felton v. Rubow, 179 P.2d 935 (Kan. 1947). “By section 59-301, “The probate courts shall be courts of record, and, within their respective counties, shall have original jurisdiction: .”
Adams v. Adams, 602 P.2d 115 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). “Prior to unification, the general powers of the probate court were set forth in K.S.A. 59-301 (Corrick, 1964). Among other *4 things, they were courts of record and could exercise “such equitable powers as may be necessary and proper fully to hear and determine any matter…”
Boldridge v. Est. of Keimig, 564 P.2d 497 (Kan. 1977). “K.S.A. 59-301 [Corrick] (see L. 1976, ch.”
In re Est. of Raney, 525 P.3d 1 (Kan. Ct. App. 2023). “Before unification, probate courts' authority to consider and hear cases was limited to the instances identified in K.S.A. 59-301 (Corrick 1964), repealed effective January 10, 1977.”
— K.S.A. § 59-301(12) — 1 case
Adams v. Adams, 602 P.2d 115 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). “Prior to unification, the general powers of the probate court were set forth in K.S.A. 59-301 (Corrick, 1964). Among other *4 things, they were courts of record and could exercise “such equitable powers as may be necessary and proper fully to hear and determine any matter…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.