Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 59-3026 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

59-3026.

History: L. 1965, ch. 347, § 26; L. 1970, ch. 231, § 1; L. 1976, ch. 242, § 95; L. 1983, ch. 191, § 16; L. 1997, ch. 87, § 1; Repealed, L. 2002, ch. 114, § 81; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Cited; circumstances rendering order approving claims voidable due to conservator's substantial conflict of interest (K.S.A. 59-1703), "other interested parties" examined. In re Conservatorship of L.M.S., 12 Kan. App. 2d 725, 729, 755 P.2d 22 (1988).

2. Chapter 59 as containing no procedures for notice of contested guardian ad litem fees noted; rules in civil cases apply. In re Guardianship of K.M.W., 13 Kan. App. 2d 640, 645, 777 P.2d 1274 (1989).

3. Death of conservatee does not discharge conservator from duty to complete statutory duties. In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Heck, 22 Kan. App. 2d 135, 140, 913 P.2d 213 (1996).


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1988–1996 · leading case: In re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Heck, 913 P.2d 213 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Heck, 913 P.2d 213 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). “” The conservator cannot be discharged from his responsibilities until after all of the property of the conservatorship estate has been adequately accounted for and delivered to the person entitled to receive the same. K.S.A. 59-3031. The Act also expressly permits the court, in…”
In Re the Conservatorship of L.M.S., 755 P.2d 22 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). “Scott as guardian was, therefore, seeking to recover the costs of the children’s shelter and health insurance from Scott as conservator under the authority of K.S.A. 59-3026, which generally allows demands against a conservatee’s estate to be made in court, and not under K.”
In re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of K.M.W., 777 P.2d 1274 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “We consider the claim of Carpenter for attorney fees was a demand against the estate within the meaning of K.S.A. 59-3026. K.S.A. 1988 Supp. 59-2212 provides that, at any probate hearing, the procedure on any issue of fact or controverted matter shall be as in other civil cases…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.