K.S.A. » Chapter 59
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 59-3030 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

59-3030.

History: L. 1965, ch. 347, § 30; L. 1983, ch. 191, § 27; L. 1989, ch. 173, § 7; Repealed, L. 2002, ch. 114, § 81; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Cited in holding probate court not authorized to determine ownership and distribute assets in settling conservatorship estate. In re Estate of Ingram, 212 Kan. 218, 224, 510 P.2d 597.

2. Cited; circumstances rendering order approving claims voidable due to conservator's substantial conflict of interest (K.S.A. 59-1703), "other interested parties" examined. In re Conservatorship of L.M.S., 12 Kan. App. 2d 725, 726, 755 P.2d 22 (1988).

3. Whether attorney's failure to advise coconservators of accounting requirements proximately caused conversion penalties precluded summary judgment. Winter v. Hope, 253 Kan. 678, 682, 684, 861 P.2d 1282 (1993).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1973–1996 · leading case: In re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Heck, 913 P.2d 213 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Heck, 913 P.2d 213 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). “See K.S.A. 59-3030; K.S.A. 59-3031; In re Conservatorship of Holman, 18 Kan.”
In Re the Conservatorship of McRoy, 861 P.2d 1378 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993). “59-3029; K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 59-3030. If a hearing is conducted, unless the court determines otherwise, “the conservator shall .”
Est. of Ingram v. Ingalls, 510 P.2d 597 (Kan. 1973). “" K.S.A. 1972 Supp. 59-3030 makes provision for the giving of notice of the hearing on an accounting.”
In Re the Conservatorship of L.M.S., 755 P.2d 22 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). “59-3011 ended when he was appointed as conservator, and Pfalzgraf therefore had no standing to contest the orders approving his claims against the children’s estates.”
In Re the Conservatorship of Holman, 849 P.2d 140 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 3× “K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 59-3031 provides that the annual accounting will be settled and allowed after a hearing on the matter.”
Winter v. Hope, 861 P.2d 1282 (Kan. 1993). · cites it 3× “”;; Factors considered by the- Court of Appeals include the following: First, under K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 59-3030, it is not mandatory that the district court conduct a heáring on an annual accounting.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.