K.S.A. » Chapter 59
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 59-3088 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

59-3088.

History: L. 2002, ch. 114, § 39; Repealed, L. 2025, ch. 40, § 167; January 1, 2026.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Conservator innocently misused conservatorship funds when he paid court-ordered child support and medical obligations with conservatorship funds; recovery costs payable to conservatorship estate. In re Conservatorship of Chapman, 36 Kan. App. 2d 730, 743, 745, 144 P.3d 771 (2006).

2. Father's expenditure of child's settlement money for needs and desires of child upheld. In re Tatro, 387 B.R. 833, 843 (2008).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2004–2016 · leading case: In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Burrell, 367 P.3d 318 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Burrell, 367 P.3d 318 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 5× “As mentioned briefly above, K.S.A. 59-3088 discusses the process and grounds for removing a guardian or conservator.”
Mohr v. Tatro (In Re Tatro), 387 B.R. 833 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2008). · cites it 3× “The trial court therefore found, and the court of appeals agreed, that Chapman had not converted the funds to his own use and therefore he was only liable for their return under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 59-3088 and not for the conversion penalty under Kan.”
In re the Conservatorship of Chapman, 144 P.3d 771 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 3× “K.S.A. 59-3088 addresses the procedure for the resignation or removal of a conservator and provides, in relevant part: “(e) At the conclusion of the hearing, if the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the guardian or conservator, or bo'Ji, should be permitted…”
Hershaw v. Farm & City Ins., 87 P.3d 360 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “58a-1004; K.S.A. 2003 Supp. 59-3086; K.S.A. 2003 Supp.”
— K.S.A. § 59-3088(c) — 1 case
In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Burrell, 367 P.3d 318 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). “As mentioned briefly above, K.S.A. 59-3088 discusses the process and grounds for removing a guardian or conservator.”
— K.S.A. § 59-3088(e) — 1 case
In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Burrell, 367 P.3d 318 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). “As mentioned briefly above, K.S.A. 59-3088 discusses the process and grounds for removing a guardian or conservator.”
— K.S.A. § 59-3088(f) — 2 cases
Mohr v. Tatro (In Re Tatro), 387 B.R. 833 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2008). “The trial court therefore found, and the court of appeals agreed, that Chapman had not converted the funds to his own use and therefore he was only liable for their return under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 59-3088 and not for the conversion penalty under Kan.”
In re the Conservatorship of Chapman, 144 P.3d 771 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “K.S.A. 59-3088 addresses the procedure for the resignation or removal of a conservator and provides, in relevant part: “(e) At the conclusion of the hearing, if the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the guardian or conservator, or bo'Ji, should be permitted…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.