Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-1103b (2026)

Subcontractors' liens; new residential property

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-1103b. Subcontractors' liens; new residential property. (a) As used in this section, "new residential property" means a new structure which is constructed for use as a residence and which is not used or intended for use as a residence for more than two families or for commercial purposes. "New residential property" does not include any improvement of a preexisting structure or construction of any addition, garage or outbuilding appurtenant to a preexisting structure.

(b) A lien for the furnishing of labor, equipment, materials or supplies for the construction of new residential property may be claimed pursuant to K.S.A. 60-1101 or 60-1103 and amendments thereto after the passage of title to such new residential property to a good faith purchaser for value only if the claimant has filed a notice of intent to perform prior to the recording of the deed effecting passage of title to such new residential property. Such notice shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the district court of the county where the property is located.

(c) The notice of intent to perform and release thereof provided for in this section, to be effective, shall be deemed sufficient if in substantial compliance with the form set forth by the judicial council.

(d) When any claimant who has filed a notice of intent to perform has been paid in full or otherwise discharged, such claimant shall be required to file in the office in which the notice of intent to perform was filed, and to pay any requisite filing fee, a release of such notice and waiver of lien which shall be executed by the claimant, shall identify the property as set forth in the notice of intent to perform, and state that it is the intention of the claimant to waive or relinquish any statutory right to a lien for the furnishing of labor or material to the property. Upon such filing, the notice of intent to perform previously filed by such claimant shall be of no further force or effect, and such claimant's right to a lien under K.S.A. 60-1101 and 60-1103, and amendments thereto, shall be extinguished.

(e) Any owner of the real estate upon which a notice of intent to perform has been filed, or any owner's heirs or assigns, or anyone acting for such owner, heirs or assigns, and after payment in full to the claimant, may make demand upon the claimant filing the notice of intent to perform, for the filing of a release of the notice and waiver of lien as provided for in subsection (d), unless the same has expired by virtue of the provisions set forth in subsection (f).

(f) Notwithstanding the requirements of subsections (d) and (e), a notice of intent to perform shall be of no further force or effect after the expiration of 18 months from the date of filing the same, unless within such time the claimant has filed a lien pursuant to K.S.A. 60-1101 and 60-1103, and amendments thereto.

History: L. 1986, ch. 217, § 3; L. 1996, ch. 233, § 1; L. 2005, ch. 101, § 15; L. 2005, ch. 186, § 15; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2000–2007 · leading case: Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand, 14 P.3d 395 (Kan. 2000).
Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand, 14 P.3d 395 (Kan. 2000). · cites it 26× “The district court, however, granted partial summary judgment in favor of the Chartrands, even though the Chartrands had not filed a motion for summary judgment.”
Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand, 157 P.3d 1109 (Kan. 2007). · cites it 2× “The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Chartrands because Owen Lumber had failed to file a notice of intent to perform as required by K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 60-1103b and had failed to comply with the notice provisions of K.”
Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand, 73 P.3d 753 (Kan. 2003). · cites it 2× “The Chartrands took title to the real estate by a quitclaim deed from Design Build filed on February 5, 1996.”
Owen Lumber Co. v. Arthur Chartrand, 998 P.2d 509 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 8× “The court ruled that Owen Lumber was not entitled to claim a lien because of its failure to comply with the requirements of K.S.A. 60-1103b and the only remaining issue was whether the Chartrands were good faith purchasers for value.”
— K.S.A. § 60-1103b(b) — 4 cases
Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand, 157 P.3d 1109 (Kan. 2007). “The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Chartrands because Owen Lumber had failed to file a notice of intent to perform as required by K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 60-1103b and had failed to comply with the notice provisions of K.”
Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand, 73 P.3d 753 (Kan. 2003). “The Chartrands took title to the real estate by a quitclaim deed from Design Build filed on February 5, 1996.”
Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand, 14 P.3d 395 (Kan. 2000). “The district court, however, granted partial summary judgment in favor of the Chartrands, even though the Chartrands had not filed a motion for summary judgment.”
Owen Lumber Co. v. Arthur Chartrand, 998 P.2d 509 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “The court ruled that Owen Lumber was not entitled to claim a lien because of its failure to comply with the requirements of K.S.A. 60-1103b and the only remaining issue was whether the Chartrands were good faith purchasers for value.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.