Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 60-258b (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
60-258b.
History: L. 1974, ch. 239, § 2; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 135, § 225; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1977–1990 · leading case: Stueve v. Am. Honda Motors Co., Inc., 457 F. Supp. 740 (D. Kan. 1978).
Stueve v. Am. Honda Motors Co., Inc., 457 F. Supp. 740 (D. Kan. 1978). “§ 60-258a, 3 VERNON’S KANSAS STATUTES ANNOTATED § 60-258b (1977 Concannon Supp.) at 87, so this problem need never arise.”
Wichita Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Black, 781 P.2d 707 (Kan. 1989). “60-258a in 1974, it also enacted K.S.A. 60-258b, which stated: “The provisions of this act shall not apply to any cause of action which has accrued prior to the effective date of this act.”
Greenwood v. McDonough Power Equip., Inc., 437 F. Supp. 707 (D. Kan. 1977). “This is done by giving the above instruction and including these persons in the special verdict form, [emphasis added] See also 3 Vernon’s Kansas Statutes Annotated § 60-258b, p. 88 (1977 Concannon Supp.). The practice of taking into consideration the liability of non-parties is…”
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Ashley, 749 F. Supp. 1065 (D. Kan. 1990). “60-258a in 1974, it also enacted K.S.A. 60-258b, which stated: ‘The provisions of this act shall not apply to any cause of action which has accrued prior to the effective date of this act.”
Kennedy v. City of Sawyer, 608 P.2d 1379 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). “60-258a; K.S.A. 60-258b. Review of precedential decisions in Brooks gave rise to the observation that those decisions provided signposts.”
Chamberlain v. Schmutz Mfg. Co., 532 F. Supp. 588 (D. Kan. 1982). “” K.S.A. 60-258b (“comparative negligence inapplicable to actions accruing before July 1, 1974”).”
Nagunst v. W. Union Tel. Co., 76 F.R.D. 631 (D. Kan. 1977). “) and 3 Vernon’s Kansas Statutes Annotated § 60-258b, p. 88 (1977 Concannon Supp.). The named defendants’ substantive right can be preserved, and diversity jurisdiction not divested, by the simple expedient of refusing to join the non-diverse tort-feasors as formal parties yet…”
Ellis v. Sketers Ex Rel. Sketers, 564 P.2d 568 (Kan. Ct. App. 1977). “(See K.S.A. 60-258b.) The judgment is reversed with directions to reinstate the verdict of the jury.”
Langhofer v. Reiss, 620 P.2d 1173 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). “§ 60-258a, § 60-258b (1978 Supp.) at 91. The same comment recognizes the near futility of resort to foreign authority for assistance in resolving any existing ambiguities as no state “has the exact combination of provisions as does Kansas,” at 88.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.