K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-4301 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-4301.

History: L. 1995, ch. 257, § 9; Repealed, L. 2022, ch. 31, § 6; July 1.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: State v. Arnett, 496 P.3d 928 (Kan. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Arnett, 496 P.3d 928 (Kan. 2021). · cites it 7× “22-3424(d)(1) states that the order of restitution shall be enforced as a judgment, specifically pursuant to K.S.A. 60-4301 through K.S.A. 60-4304, all of which make criminal restitution virtually identical to a civil judgment.”
State v. Robison, 496 P.3d 892 (Kan. 2021). · cites it 7× “22- 3424(d)(1) states that the order of restitution shall be enforced as a judgment, specifically pursuant to K.S.A. 60-4301 through K.S.A. 60-4304, all of which make criminal restitution virtually identical to a civil judgment.”
State v. Owens, 496 P.3d 902 (Kan. 2021). “21-6604(b)(2); K.S.A. 60-4301. Owens argues this statutory scheme violates section 5 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights, which provides: "The right of trial by jury shall be inviolate.”
State v. Brown, 498 P.3d 167 (Kan. 2021). “21-6604(b)(2); K.S.A. 60-4301. Brown argues that allowing a district court judge to determine the amount of restitution in a criminal case violates section 5.”
State v. Alderson, 322 P.3d 364 (Kan. 2014). “22-3424(d) (Furse 1995) and K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 60-4301 et seq. is an issue of first impression before this court.”
Tonge v. Werholtz, 109 P.3d 1140 (Kan. 2005). “K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-4301. While we did not reach the double jeopardy issue raised in Hymer because it was resolved by statutory considerations, the allowance of a new order of restitution based on a prior criminal sentence would have created the opportunity of the holder of a…”
State v. Robison, 469 P.3d 83 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). “25, § 274. From there, he springs to the conclusion that criminal restitution should be treated like a civil remedy because such orders can be enforced like civil judgments under K.”
State v. Hall, 49 P.3d 19 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “If the revocation is overturned, the length of Hall’s probation will be relevant.”
State v. Morrison, 14 P.3d 1189 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “If the court orders restitution to be paid to the victim or the victim’s family, the order shall be enforced as a judgment of restitution pursuant to K.S.A. 1995 Supp. 60-4301 through 60-4304.”
Puckett v. Bruce, 73 P.3d 736 (Kan. 2003). “If, after 60 days from the date restitution is ordered by the court, a defendant is found to be in noncompliance with the plan established by the court for payment of restitution, and the victim to whom restitution is ordered paid has not initiated proceedings in accordance with…”
State v. Hannebohn, 301 P.3d 340 (Kan. Ct. App. 2013). “If the court orders restitution to be paid to the victim or the victim’s family, the order shall be enforced as a judgment of restitution pursuant to K.S.A. 60-4301 through 60-4304.” The Kansas Supreme Court has held that under this statute a district court is permitted to hold…”
State v. Jamerson (Kan. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 4× “Garnishment could be commenced "in accordance with K.S.A. 60-4301 et seq., and amendments thereto.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.