K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-901 (2026)

Nature of injunction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-901. Nature of injunction. Injunction is an order to do or refrain from doing a particular act. It may be the final judgment in an action, and it may also be allowed as a provisional remedy.

History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-901; January 1, 1964.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Meneley, 22 P.3d 124 (Kan. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Meneley, 22 P.3d 124 (Kan. 2001). · cites it 4× “Meneley attempts to frame this issue as one involving the interpretation of K.S.A. 60-901 seeking a de novo review. This issue, however, does not involve the interpretation of a statute.”
Balmer Fund, Inc. v. City of Harper, 294 F. Supp. 3d 1136 (D. Kan. 2018). · cites it 4× “Plaintiffs also argue that no "final judgment" exists because K.S.A. §§ 60-901 et seq. required the state court to conduct an evidentiary hearing before entering a final judgment.”
N. Nat. Gas Co. v. ONEOK Field Servs. Co., 296 P.3d 1106 (Kan. 2013). “55-1210(d) and K.S.A. 60-901. On appeal, Supra argued the testing provisions of K.”
Rice v. State, 95 P.3d 994 (Kan. 2004). · cites it 2× “FACTS: Petitioners filed a petition in district court pursuant to K.S.A. 60-901 et seq., seeking to enjoin DOC from denying them gift subscriptions to newspapers and magazines.”
Wolfe Elec., Inc. v. Duckworth, 266 P.3d 516 (Kan. 2011). “Wolfe Electric filed a posttrial motion under K.S.A. 60-901 and K.S.A. 60-3321(a) seeking to permanently enjoin Global from involvement in conveyor pizza ovens.”
Padron v. Lopez, 220 P.3d 345 (Kan. 2009). “Finally, Dodson asserted the judgment should be quashed because a bond had not been posted in Franklin County District Court as required by K.S.A. 60-901, the Kansas injunction statute.”
Nat'l Compressed Steel Corp. v. Unified Gov't of Wyandotte Cnty./Kansas City, 38 P.3d 723 (Kan. 2002). · cites it 2× “An injunction is not appropriate if a remedy at law can furnish the injured party with the full relief to which he or she is entitled.”
Mid-Am. Pipeline Co. v. Wietharn, 787 P.2d 716 (Kan. 1990). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 60-901. Injunctions apply to future events rather than to past or completed acts.”
Gen. Bldg. Contractors, L.L.C. v. Bd. of Shawnee Cnty. Commissioners, 66 P.3d 873 (Kan. 2003). “On March 29,2002, GBC and Tolbert filed a separate injunction action pursuant to K.S.A. 60-901 et seq., seeking a temporary restraining order prohibiting the county from going forward with eminent domain proceedings and a permanent injunction prohibiting the county from taking…”
Cole v. Mayans, 80 P.3d 384 (Kan. 2003). “K.S.A. 60-901 et seq. does not limit who may bring a cause of action for an injunction, and Mayans has failed to direct the court *872 to any other law limiting Cole’s right to petition for an injunction.”
Hunter Health Clinic v. Wichita State Univ., 362 P.3d 10 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Hunter presents an alternative argument: “Even if the Eagle could somehow establish that Hunter has no statutory standing to bring its claims under KORA .”
Sampel v. Balbernie, 889 P.2d 804 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “: Tiny Sampel appeals the dismissal of her petition for injunctive relief under K.S.A. 60-901 et seq. to restrain Robert Balbemie from assaulting, harassing, and threatening her.”
Show all 34 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.