K.S.A. » Chapter 65
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 65-1135 (2026)

Complaint or information relating to complaint confidential; exceptions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

65-1135. Complaint or information relating to complaint confidential; exceptions. (a) Any complaint or report, record or other information relating to the investigation of a complaint about a person licensed by the board which is received, obtained or maintained by the board is confidential and shall not be disclosed by the board or its employees in a manner which identified or enables identification of the person who is the subject or source of such information except:

(1) In a disciplinary proceeding conducted by the board pursuant to law or in an appeal of the order of the board entered in such proceeding, or to any party to such proceeding or appeal or such party's attorney;

(2) to the proper licensing or disciplinary authority of another jurisdiction, if any disciplinary action authorized by K.S.A. 65-1120 and amendments thereto has at any time been taken against the licensee or the board has at any time denied a license certificate or authorization to the person; or

(3) to the person who is the subject of the information, but the board may require disclosure in such a manner as to prevent identification of any other person who is the subject or source of the information.

(b) This section shall be part of and supplemental to the Kansas nurse practice act.

History: L. 1993, ch. 194, § 8; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Statutory peer review privilege is outweighed by plaintiff's right to access to facts in negligence action. Adams v. St. Francis Regional Med. Center, 264 Kan. 144, 153, 159, 955 P.2d 1169 (1998).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1998–2003 · leading case: Adams v. St. Francis Reg'l Med. Ctr., 955 P.2d 1169 (Kan. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Adams v. St. Francis Reg'l Med. Ctr., 955 P.2d 1169 (Kan. 1998). · cites it 20× “Francis' second motion for protective order] are protected by K.S.A. 65-1135, 65-4915, 65-4922, 65-4923 and 65-4925.”
Lloyd v. Quorum Health Resources, L.L.C., 77 P.3d 993 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Lloyd argues he was entitled to the State Board of Nursing records during discovery and the records are not subject to any privilege.”
— K.S.A. § 65-1135(a) — 2 cases
Adams v. St. Francis Reg'l Med. Ctr., 955 P.2d 1169 (Kan. 1998). “Francis' second motion for protective order] are protected by K.S.A. 65-1135, 65-4915, 65-4922, 65-4923 and 65-4925.”
Lloyd v. Quorum Health Resources, L.L.C., 77 P.3d 993 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003). “Lloyd argues he was entitled to the State Board of Nursing records during discovery and the records are not subject to any privilege.”
— K.S.A. § 65-1135(a)(1) — 1 case
Adams v. St. Francis Reg'l Med. Ctr., 955 P.2d 1169 (Kan. 1998). “Francis' second motion for protective order] are protected by K.S.A. 65-1135, 65-4915, 65-4922, 65-4923 and 65-4925.”
— K.S.A. § 65-1135(a)(l) — 1 case
Adams v. St. Francis Reg'l Med. Ctr., 955 P.2d 1169 (Kan. 1998). “Francis' second motion for protective order] are protected by K.S.A. 65-1135, 65-4915, 65-4922, 65-4923 and 65-4925.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.