K.S.A. » Chapter 65
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 65-2848 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

65-2848.

History: L. 1957, ch. 343, § 48; L. 1976, ch. 273, § 22; L. 1979, ch. 198, § 7; Repealed, L. 1984, ch. 313, § 157; July 1, 1985.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Findings of board supported by substantial evidence; district court may not substitute its judgment for that of the board; revocation of license upheld. Kansas State Board of Healing Arts v. Foote, 200 Kan. 447, 449, 450, 436 P.2d 828.

2. Cited in construing K.S.A. 44-1011 as not imposing trial de novo in derogation of constitutional doctrine of separation of powers. Jenkins v. Newman Memorial County Hospital, 212 Kan. 92, 98, 510 P.2d 132.

3. Cited in holding K.S.A. 60-2101 (a) does not permit trial de novo in district court from order of administrative agency. Copeland v. Kansas State Board of Examiners in Optometry, 213 Kan. 741, 742, 518 P.2d 377.

4. Applied; suspension of license to practice professional nursing held arbitrary and unreasonable. Kansas State Board of Nursing v. Burkman, 216 Kan. 187, 188, 190, 531 P.2d 122.

5. Referred to in determining scope of review on appeal from school board decision limited by K.S.A. 60-2101. Brinson v. School District, 223 Kan. 465, 468, 576 P.2d 602.

6. Appealing party has 60 days from entry of order to file notice of appeal; ten-day notice merely advisory. Kansas State Board of Healing Arts v. Dickerson, 229 Kan. 627, 628, 629, 630, 629 P.2d 187 (1981).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1981–1981 · leading case: Kansas State Bd. of Healing Arts v. Dickerson, 629 P.2d 187 (Kan. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kansas State Bd. of Healing Arts v. Dickerson, 629 P.2d 187 (Kan. 1981). · cites it 5× “September 19, 1980: The trial court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because notice of intention to appeal was not filed within the ten days required by K.S.A. 65-2848, which provides: “At any time within sixty (60) days after the entry of the order of the board, or…”
Kansas Real Est. Comm'n v. Pottratz, 626 P.2d 1243 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “The governing statute on scope of review was K.S.A. 65-2848 (Corrick) which provided that a transcript of pleadings before the board should be filed with the district court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.