Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 72-5411 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
72-5411.
History: L. 1951, ch. 413, § 2; L. 1970, ch. 284, § 13; L. 1978, ch. 292, § 1; L. 1980, ch. 220, § 16; L. 1984, ch. 266, § 1; L. 1992, ch. 20, § 1; L. 1995, ch. 263, § 2; Repealed, L. 2008, ch. 125, § 5; May 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases, 1971–2004 · leading case: Brinson v. Sch. Dist. 431, 576 P.2d 602 (Kan. 1978).
Brinson v. Sch. Dist. 431, 576 P.2d 602 (Kan. 1978). “72-5411 reads: "All contracts of employment of teachers in the public schools in the state, shall continue in full force and effect during good behavior and efficient and competent service rendered by the teacher, and all such contracts of employment shall be deemed to continue…”
Thompson v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 259, 819 P.2d 1236 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “Thompson claims ;his employment was terminated unlawfully and he was *43 entitled to notice on or before April 10 of the year in which he was terminated or he could assume he would be offered a contract for the next school year as mandated under K.S.A. 72-5411 and K.S.A.…”
In Re the Due Process Hearing of McReynolds, 44 P.3d 391 (Kan. 2002). “causes the focus to shift to the continuing contract provisions as set forth in K.S.A. 72-5411 and - 5412.” Within the Kansas statutory scheme, a tenured teacher such as McReynolds may be nonrenewed only if good cause is shown.”
McMillen v. U.S.D. No. 380, 855 P.2d 896 (Kan. 1993). “McMillen’s next argument in support of his contention that his salary should continue to be paid throughout the completion of the due process procedure and through all appeals taken therefrom is that “The Provisions of the Kansas Continuing Contract Law, K.S.A. 72-5411 et seq.,…”
Gragg v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 287, 627 P.2d 335 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). “) At the time the parties entered into the contract in June 1978, K.S.A. 72-5411 (Weeks), the “continuing contract” law, provided: “All contracts of employment of teachers in the public schools in the state, shall continue in full force and effect during good behavior and…”
Prager v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 20 P.3d 39 (Kan. 2001). “When this happened in 1972, Kansas did not have a statutory procedure for a hearing of a public school teacher, and we noted that under K.S.A. 72-5411, the continuing contract law in effect required a finding that Wertz had a property interest in his contract and should have…”
Burk v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 329, Wabaunsee Cty., 646 F. Supp. 1557 (D. Kan. 1986). “A nontenured teacher is, however, entitled to timely notice of nonrenewal (by April 10) under the Continuing Contract Law, K.S.A. 72-5411. The Administrators’ Act, K.”
Baldwin v. Bd. of Educ., 930 P.2d 18 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). “2d 1236 (1991), held that K.S.A. 72-5411 and K.S.A. 72-5437 “unambiguously state they apply to teacher terminations.”
Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 928 P.2d 57 (Kan. 1996). “*144 K.S.A. 72-5411(a). The Kansas Administrators’ Act contains no similar language.”
Schulze v. Bd. of Educ., 559 P.2d 367 (Kan. 1977). “The board did not proceed under K.S.A. 72-5411; instead it requested the teacher's resignation.”
Chee-Craw Teachers Ass'n v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 247, 593 P.2d 406 (Kan. 1979). “This is not a statutory item and the topic is covered by K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 72-5411 and the Due Process Act (K.”
Bogart v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 298 of Lincoln Cty., 432 F. Supp. 895 (D. Kan. 1977). “Kansas does have, and did have at the time in question, a “continuing contract law” applicable to teachers’ contracts, as follows: “All contracts of employment of teachers in the public schools in the state, shall continue in full force ¿nd effect during good behavior and…”
— K.S.A. § 72-5411(a) — 2 cases
Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 928 P.2d 57 (Kan. 1996). “*144 K.S.A. 72-5411(a). The Kansas Administrators’ Act contains no similar language.”
In Re the Due Process Hearing of McReynolds, 44 P.3d 391 (Kan. 2002). “causes the focus to shift to the continuing contract provisions as set forth in K.S.A. 72-5411 and - 5412.” Within the Kansas statutory scheme, a tenured teacher such as McReynolds may be nonrenewed only if good cause is shown.”
— K.S.A. § 72-5411(c) — 1 case
Baldwin v. Bd. of Educ., 930 P.2d 18 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). “2d 1236 (1991), held that K.S.A. 72-5411 and K.S.A. 72-5437 “unambiguously state they apply to teacher terminations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.