History:
L. 1992, ch. 280, § 12; L. 2014, ch. 93, § 39; Repealed, L. 2015, ch. 4, § 81; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Whether the school district finance and quality performance act (L. 1992, Ch. 280) recapture provisions are an unconstitutional taking examined. U.S.D. No. 229 v. State, 256 Kan. 232, 235, 270, 885 P.2d 1170 (1994).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1994–2016 · leading case: Gannon v. State, 368 P.3d 1024 (Kan. 2016).
Gannon v. State, 368 P.3d 1024 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 4דK.S.A. 72-6416; K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 72-6431(d).”
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “Once turned over to the State, these monies are deposited in the State School District Finance Fund and are remitted to those districts which do not have sufficient local effort to fully fund the district’s state financial aid.”
Bonner Springs Unified Sch. Dist. No. 204 v. Blue Valley Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229, 95 P.3d 655 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “72-6410(c), thus affecting the Johnson County school districts’ entitlement to state financial aid pursuant to K.S.A. 72-6416. Contemporaneous with the filing of their petition, plaintiffs filed a motion for temporary injunction, requesting that sales tax revenues not be paid to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.